Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410607›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2020

Determining the prevalence of palliative needs and exploring screening accuracy of depression and anxiety items of the integrated palliative care outcome scale - a multi-centre study.

Bárbara Antunes, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, Irene J Higginson, Pedro Lopes Ferreira

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bárbara AntunesPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. bc521@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1655-7391
Pedro Pereira RodriguesCentre for Health Technology and Services Research, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Irene J HigginsonKing's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Pedro Lopes FerreiraCentre for Health Studies and Research, Av. Dias da Silva, 165, 3000-512, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian Programa Gulbenkian Inovar em SaúdeFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/0003/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/113664/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpatients with palliative needs often experience high symptom burden which causes suffering to themselves and their families. Depression and psychological distress should not be considered a "normal event" in advanced disease patients and should be screened, diagnosed, acted on and followed-up. Psychological distress has been associated with greater physical symptom severity, suffering, and mortality in cancer patients. A holistic, but short measure should be used for physical and non-physical needs assessment. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale is one such measure. This work aims to determine palliative needs of patients and explore screening accuracy of two items pertaining to psychological needs.

methodsmulti-centred observational study using convenience sampling. Data were collected in 9 Portuguese centres. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ≥18 years, mentally fit to give consent, diagnosed with an incurable, potentially life-threatening illness. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patient in distress ("unable to converse for a period of time"), cognitively impaired. Descriptive statistics used for demographics. Receiving Operator Characteristics curves and Area Under the Curve for anxiety and depression discriminant properties against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

results1703 individuals were screened between July 1st, 2015 and February 2016. A total of 135 (7.9%) were included. Main reason for exclusion was being healthy (75.2%). The primary care centre screened most individuals, as they have the highest rates of daily patients and the majority are healthy. Mean age is 66.8 years (SD 12.7), 58 (43%) are female. Most patients had a cancer diagnosis 109 (80.7%). Items scoring highest (=4) were: family or friends anxious or worried (36.3%); feeling anxious or worried about illness (13.3%); feeling depressed (9.6%). Using a cut-off score of 2/3, Area Under the Curve for depression and anxiety items were above 70%.

conclusionsmain palliative needs were psychological, family related and spiritual. This suggests that clinical teams may better manage physical issues and there is room for improvement regarding non-physical needs. Using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale systematically could aid clinical teams screening patients for distressing needs and track their progress in assisting patients and families with those issues.

Indexed as

PrevalenceAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPalliative CarePortugalSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDepressionEnd of life careOutcome measurementPalliative carePatient centred outcome measuresScreening accuracySuffering

Identifiers

PMID32410607
PMCPMC7226940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.