Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410573›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Broad-coverage biomedical relation extraction with SemRep.

Halil Kilicoglu, Graciela Rosemblat, Marcelo Fiszman, Dongwook Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of pipelines, seq2seq models, and LLMs for rare disease information extraction.Natural language processing and information systems : ... International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB ... revised papers. International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Info... · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DiMB-RE: mining the scientific literature for diet-microbiome associations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Semantics-enabled biomedical literature analytics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Halil KilicogluLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA. halil@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3987-9393
Graciela RosemblatLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA.
Marcelo FiszmanIndependent Researcher, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Dongwook ShinLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 20894, MD, USA.

Funding

U.S. National Library of Medicine Intramural
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of information overload, natural language processing (NLP) techniques are increasingly needed to support advanced biomedical information management and discovery applications. In this paper, we present an in-depth description of SemRep, an NLP system that extracts semantic relations from PubMed abstracts using linguistic principles and UMLS domain knowledge. We also evaluate SemRep on two datasets. In one evaluation, we use a manually annotated test collection and perform a comprehensive error analysis. In another evaluation, we assess SemRep's performance on the CDR dataset, a standard benchmark corpus annotated with causal chemical-disease relationships.

resultsA strict evaluation of SemRep on our manually annotated dataset yields 0.55 precision, 0.34 recall, and 0.42 F

conclusionsSemRep is a broad-coverage, interpretable, strong baseline system for extracting semantic relations from biomedical text. It also underpins SemMedDB, a literature-scale knowledge graph based on semantic relations. Through SemMedDB, SemRep has had significant impact in the scientific community, supporting a variety of clinical and translational applications, including clinical decision making, medical diagnosis, drug repurposing, literature-based discovery and hypothesis generation, and contributing to improved health outcomes. In ongoing development, we are redesigning SemRep to increase its modularity and flexibility, and addressing weaknesses identified in the error analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInformation Storage and RetrievalSemanticsHumansNatural Language ProcessingPubMedUnified Medical Language SystemBiomedical relation extractionNatural language processingScientific publicationsSemantic interpretation

Identifiers

PMID32410573
PMCPMC7222583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.