ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non-Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in non-culprit coronary lesions with PCSK9 inhibitors: the randomised, placebo-controlled FITTER trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Role of Circulating Microparticles in Impairing Endothelial Function and Activating Oxidative Stress Is Related to No-Reflow in STEMI.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- [Evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction for assessing prognosis of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction following reperfusion therapy: insights from QFR-AMR].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Differential Effects of Intravenous Versus Intracoronary Adenosine on Non-Culprit Lesion Assessment Following Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Functional assessment in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of acute versus staged interventions.REC, interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in Takotsubo syndrome: an analysis using angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Combined risk estimates of diabetes and coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Observational
- Stem Cells to the Rescue: Development and Application of Cell-Based Therapy for Microvascular Repair.Cells · 2021Article
- Coronary microvascular adaptations distal to epicardial artery stenosis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021Review
- Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non-Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study investigated whether the microvascular dysfunction differed between culprit and non-culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results In 115 prospectively recruited patients, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, culprit and non-culprit intracoronary hemodynamic measurements were performed and repeated at 6-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.