ArticleTransfusion2020
Isoagglutinin reduction in intravenous immunoglobulin (IgPro10, Privigen) by specific immunoaffinity chromatography reduces its reporting rates of hemolytic reactions: an analysis of spontaneous adverse event reports.
Article in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors for intravenous immunoglobulin-related hemolysis: A systematic review of clinical trial and real-world populations.Transfusion · 2022Pooled it
- Characteristics of adverse events and clinical risks of intravenous immunoglobulin: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Intravenous Immunoglobulin-Associated Severe Hemolytic Anemia.Journal of medical cases · 2023Article
- Cation exchange chromatography removes FXIa from a 10% intravenous immunoglobulin preparation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHemolysis is an infrequent but recognized and potentially serious adverse effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Relatively elevated hemolysis reporting rates were seen with some IVIG products with high anti-A/B isoagglutinin content, among which IgPro10 (Privigen, CSL Behring). For IgPro10, two isoagglutinin reduction measures were successively implemented: 1) anti-A donor screening and 2) immunoaffinity chromatography (IAC; Ig IsoLo)-based isoagglutinin reduction step included in the production process. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effects of these isoagglutinin reduction measures on the reporting rates of IgPro10 hemolysis worldwide. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsBetween February 2008 and December 2018, hemolysis reports from the CSL Behring Global Safety Database were analyzed in relationship to changes in IVIG IgPro10 production methods. Further analysis classified hemolysis reports by indication and blood group.
resultsMedian (minimum-maximum) anti-A/anti-B titers were 32 (8-64)/16 (8-32) at baseline, 32 (8-64)/16 (8-32) after donor screening, and 8 (8-32)/4 (2-8) after implementation of IAC. The reporting rate of hemolytic reactions per 1000 kg IgPro10 sold was 4.05 cases at baseline, 2.00 after donor screening, and 0.50 after implementation of IAC. In 2018, there were seven reports of hemolytic reactions; representing 0.18 cases per 1000 kg IgPro10 sold, with a reduction of 95.6% versus baseline.
conclusionFollowing implementation of the IAC isoagglutinin reduction step, spontaneous reports of hemolytic events with IgPro10 were significantly and consistently reduced versus IgPro10 without isoagglutinin reduction, offering patients a more favorable benefit-risk profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.