ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020
Effect of a prospective audit with intervention and feedback on Clostridioides difficile infection management.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of an Intervention Program onOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Understanding the role of antibiotic-associated adverse events in influencing antibiotic decision-making.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
- Effects of monthly evaluations on the rates of irrational antimicrobial prescription in the outpatient and emergency departments at Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, Ningbo, China.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Improving care for patients withFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Clostridioides difficile infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in several countries. Their increasing incidence and frequent recurrence make them an urgent public health threat. The lack of adherence to international treatment guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infections is a proven mortality risk factor. Objective To evaluate long-term prescribers' adherence to recommendations on the management of Clostridioides difficile infections and its impact on clinical outcomes after an educational and Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback period. Setting All patients admitted to a 1500-bed university hospital with positive Clostridioides difficile tests identified were included. Methods Data were collected retrospectively over a baseline period (May-November 2014) and prospectively over a Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback period (November 2015-May 2016) and an observation period (November 2017-September 2018). All Clostridioides difficile cases were reviewed by a Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback team composed of pharmacists, an infectious diseases specialist and a microbiologist to obtain a complete overview of patient records in each area of expertise. Main outcome measures Percentage of conformity to the protocol, percentage of recovery at 10 days and percentage of relapse, as well as Clostridioides difficile incidence and percentage of Fidaxomicin use. Results A total of 183 patients were included over the three periods. A significant improvement in conformity to the local protocol was observed between the intervention period (23.9%) and the observation period (67.3%) (P < 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.