Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410196›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2020

Elective, Non-urgent Procedures and Aesthetic Surgery in the Wake of SARS-COVID-19: Considerations Regarding Safety, Feasibility and Impact on Clinical Management.

K Kaye, F Paprottka, R Escudero, G Casabona, J Montes, R Fakin, L Moke, T Stasch, D Richter, J Benito-Ruiz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: Identifying healthcare delays.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Preeclampsia in the Context of COVID-19: Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Review
  6. Increased time to surgery and worse perioperative outcome in benign brain tumor patients with COVID-19.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of Safety Protocols for International Cleft Outreach Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Global Smile Foundation Precaution Guidelines and Implications.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plastic Surgery Practice during COVID Times.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2022
    Article
  20. Bridging the gap for aesthetic training amidst the Covid-19 pandemic.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

K KayeOcean Clinic Marbella, Marbella, Spain. Dr.kaye@oceanclinic.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-8569
F PaprottkaOcean Clinic Marbella, Marbella, Spain.
R EscuderoOcean Clinic Marbella, Marbella, Spain.
G CasabonaOcean Clinic Marbella, Marbella, Spain.
J MontesTorre Medica Auxilio Mutuo, San Juan, PR, USA.
R FakinOcean Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
L MokeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
T StaschVitality Fountain Clinic Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
D RichterDepartment for Plastic Surgery, Dreifaltigkeitskrankenhaus Wesseling, Wesseling, Germany.
J Benito-RuizAntiaging Group Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Auxilio Mutuo Hospital · PRCenter for Pediatric Endocrinology Zurich · CHKU Leuven · BEOcean Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe worldwide spread of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to a near total stop of non-urgent, elective surgeries across all specialties in most affected countries. In the field of aesthetic surgery, the self-imposed moratorium for all aesthetic surgery procedures recommended by most international scientific societies has been adopted by many surgeons worldwide and resulted in a huge socioeconomic impact for most private practices and clinics. An important question still unanswered in most countries is when and how should elective/aesthetic procedures be scheduled again and what kind of organizational changes are necessary to protect patients and healthcare workers when clinics and practices reopen. Defining manageable, evidence-based protocols for testing, surgical/procedural risk mitigation and clinical flow management/contamination management will be paramount for the safety of non-urgent surgical procedures.

methodsWe conducted a MEDLINE/PubMed research for all available publications on COVID-19 and surgery and COVID-19 and anesthesia. Articles and referenced literature describing possible procedural impact factors leading to exacerbation of the clinical evolution of COVID-19-positive patients were identified to perform risk stratification for elective surgery. Based on these impact factors, considerations for patient selection, choice of procedural complexity, duration of procedure, type of anesthesia, etc., are discussed in this article and translated into algorithms for surgical/anesthesia risk management and clinical management. Current recommendations and published protocols on contamination control, avoidance of cross-contamination and procedural patient flow are reviewed. A COVID-19 testing guideline protocol for patients planning to undergo elective aesthetic surgery is presented and recommendations are made regarding adaptation of current patient information/informed consent forms and patient health questionnaires.

conclusionThe COVID-19 crisis has led to unprecedented challenges in the acute management of the crisis, and the wave only recently seems to flatten out in some countries. The adaptation of surgical and procedural steps for a risk-minimizing management of potential COVID-19-positive patients seeking to undergo elective aesthetic procedures in the wake of that wave will present the next big challenge for the aesthetic surgery community. We propose a clinical algorithm to enhance patient safety in elective surgery in the context of COVID-19 and to minimize cross-contamination between healthcare workers and patients. New evidence-based guidelines regarding surgical risk stratification, testing, and clinical flow management/contamination management are proposed. We believe that only the continuous development and broad implementation of guidelines like the ones proposed in this paper will allow an early reintegration of all aesthetic procedures into the scope of surgical care currently performed and to prepare the elective surgical specialties better for a possible second wave of the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsClinical Laboratory TechniquesCommunicable Disease ControlCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDisease ManagementElective Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfection ControlAesthetic surgeryClinical care protocolContamination managementCOVID-19COVID-19 PCR testCOVID-19 prophylaxisElective surgeryIGM/IGG antibody rapid testingPatient safetyPatient selectionProcedure flowSARS-Cov-2

Identifiers

PMID32410196
PMCPMC7224128
OpenAlexW3024637745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.