Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410161›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Role of drain amylase levels assay and routinary postoperative day 3 abdominal CT scan in prevention of complications and management of surgical drains after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Damiano Caputo, Silvia Angeletti, Massimo Ciccozzi, Mariacristina Cartillone, Chiara Cascone, Vincenzo La Vaccara, Alessandro Coppola, Roberto Coppola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypoattenuated Area at Pancreatojejunostomy Site After Pancreatoduodenectomy Predicts Grade B/C Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damiano CaputoDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Silvia AngelettiUnit of Clinical Laboratory Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CiccozziUnit of Medical Statistic and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mariacristina CartilloneDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CasconeDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo La VaccaraDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro CoppolaDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. a.coppola@unicampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5550-1756
Roberto CoppolaDepartment of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To asses drains amylase (DA) cut-offs for the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and define the optimal timing of drains removal based on daily DA assay and abdominal CT scan finding after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Different algorithms able to identify patients at higher risk of POPF and to assess the optimal time for drains removal after PD have been proposed. The most accurate DA cut-offs in the assessment of the risk of clinically relevant POPF were retrospectively identified. Data from a prospective trial for optimal timing of drains removal were analyzed. Then, to validate the cut-offs identified in the first phase, they were applied to the patients enrolled in the prospective trial. Patients with POD1 DA ≥ 666 U/L were at higher risk of clinically relevant POPF (p 0.0001). POD3 DA value ≥ 252 U/L predicted 88% of clinical relevant fistulas. POD3 DA level ≥ 207 U/L was able to predict 68% of biliary fistulas. Patients with abdominal collection ≥ 5 cm, showed a significantly higher rate (60% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) of biliary fistula. Timing of drains removal did not influence complications. Drains amylase levels predict clinically relevant POPF. Drains should be maintained up to POD3; in case of POD1 DA levels < 666 U/L and POD3 DA levels < 252 U/L drains could be removed. In case of POD3 DA levels, ≥ 207 the routine use of abdominal CT scan in the same day could be justified to detect collections ≥ 5 cm and maintain drains beyond the POD3.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmylasesBiliary FistulaBiomarkersDevice RemovalDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAmylasesBiomarkersPancreas anastomosisPancreatic fistulaPancreatic surgeryPancreatic surgery complicationsSurgical drains management

Identifiers

PMID32410161
OpenAlexW3028306082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.