Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410121›Full record

Observational studyActa neurochirurgica2020

Functional outcome, in-hospital healthcare consumption and in-hospital costs for hospitalised traumatic brain injury patients: a Dutch prospective multicentre study.

Jeroen T J M van Dijck, Cassidy Q B Mostert, Alexander P A Greeven, Erwin J O Kompanje, Wilco C Peul, Godard C W de Ruiter, Suzanne Polinder

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. The impact of delayed time to first CT head on functional outcomes after blunt head trauma with moderately depressed GCS.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeroen T J M van DijckDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, LUMC, HMC & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden, The Hague, The Netherlands. dijck@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-632X
Cassidy Q B MostertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, LUMC, HMC & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Alexander P A GreevenDepartment of Surgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Erwin J O KompanjeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilco C PeulDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, LUMC, HMC & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Godard C W de RuiterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, LUMC, HMC & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Suzanne PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high occurrence and acute and chronic sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI) cause major healthcare and socioeconomic challenges. This study aimed to describe outcome, in-hospital healthcare consumption and in-hospital costs of patients with TBI.

methodsWe used data from hospitalised TBI patients that were included in the prospective observational CENTER-TBI study in three Dutch Level I Trauma Centres from 2015 to 2017. Clinical data was completed with data on in-hospital healthcare consumption and costs. TBI severity was classified using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Patient outcome was measured by in-hospital mortality and Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended (GOSE) at 6 months. In-hospital costs were calculated following the Dutch guidelines for cost calculation.

resultsA total of 486 TBI patients were included. Mean age was 56.1 ± 22.4 years and mean GCS was 12.7 ± 3.8. Six-month mortality (4.2%-66.7%), unfavourable outcome (GOSE ≤ 4) (14.6%-80.4%) and full recovery (GOSE = 8) (32.5%-5.9%) rates varied from patients with mild TBI (GCS13-15) to very severe TBI (GCS3-5). Length of stay (8 ± 13 days) and in-hospital costs (€11,920) were substantial and increased with higher TBI severity, presence of intracranial abnormalities, extracranial injury and surgical intervention. Costs were primarily driven by admission (66%) and surgery (13%).

conclusionIn-hospital mortality and unfavourable outcome rates were rather high, but many patients also achieved full recovery. Hospitalised TBI patients show substantial in-hospital healthcare consumption and costs, even in patients with mild TBI. Because these costs are likely to be an underestimation of the actual total costs, more research is required to investigate the actual costs-effectiveness of TBI care.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedBrain Injuries, TraumaticFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsTreatment OutcomeFunctional outcomeIn-hospital costsMortalityTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32410121
PMCPMC7295836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.