ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Radiologic diagnosis of pathologic fractures].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Associations of preoperative Oswestry Disability Index and EuroQol-5D with long-term all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Undiagnosed Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in an Octogenarian During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.Cureus · 2023Article
- [Radiological aspects in the diagnostics of pathological fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPathologic fractures are fractures that occur without an adequate traumatic event due to focal benign or malignant skeletal lesions. The most common causes of pathologic fractures are cystic bone lesions, plasmocytoma or multiple myeloma, and the development of osseous metastases, which is increasing due to an aging general population and advances in cancer treatment. The differentiation of pathologic fractures from stress fractures, especially osteoporotic insufficiency fractures is crucial for correct treatment planning.
objectivesThis review intends to explain the imaging characteristics of pathologic fractures. Moreover, it explains the role of imaging when pathologic fractures are suspected. In addition, the Mirels' score and the SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score), which are powerful yet easy-to-use tools for the assessment of the fracture risk of benign or malignant bony lesions of the extremities and the vertebral column, shall be introduced. MATERIALS AND
methodsA PubMed literature search with the following terms was conducted: "pathologic fracture", "fatigue fracture", "insufficiency fracture", "treatment of pathologic fractures", "imaging of pathologic fractures", "fracture risk", "bone metastases", "MRI of pathologic fractures", "CT of pathologic fractures", "differentiation of pathologic and insufficiency fractures", "Mirels' score", "SINS" and "spinal instability neoplastic score".
resultsThe definitions of pathologic, fatigue, and insufficiency fractures are explained. Moreover, the role of imaging in the clinical workup of suspected pathologic fractures and the differentiation of pathologic fractures from fatigue or insufficiency fractures as well as common scoring systems to assess the fracture risk of pathologic fractures are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.