Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32410065›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2020

Engaging a Community Advisory Board to Inform an Exercise Intervention in Older African-American Couples.

Lyndsey M Hornbuckle, Amy Rauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lyndsey M HornbuckleDepartment of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sport Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 322 HPER Building, 1914 Andy Holt Avenue, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. lhornbuc@utk.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0217-3004
Amy RauerDepartment of Child and Family Studies, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 422 Jessie Harris Building, 1215 W. Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Knoxville College · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes our approach to forming and engaging a community advisory board (CAB) to assist in the development of a proposed exercise intervention pilot study. The intervention aimed to examine the effects of exercise on exercise adherence, the provision of partner support and receptivity to partner health influence, and cardiometabolic risk in older African-American romantic couples. CAB invitations were extended to local community members and leaders who had a stake in the health of the target population. Seven individuals accepted the invitation and attended at least one of two CAB meetings during which we proposed ideas for the exercise intervention pilot study, then solicited CAB input in four key areas related to the study including: (1) priority health concerns of the target population, (2) the intervention protocol and methodologies, (3) cultural relevance, and (4) sustainability. Two investigators jointly led both CAB meetings, which lasted approximately 3 h each. Recorded community feedback was summarized and coded using a thematic analysis approach. Themes were identified and agreed upon within the four areas identified above. Overall, the proposed study was well-received by the CAB and considered beneficial for and relevant to the target population. Although not all suggestions put forth by the CAB were feasible given the inherent limitations of pilot work, we made multiple study modifications as a result of CAB recommendations. Further, all CAB feedback helped inform plans to launch the intervention on a larger scale and were vital in ensuring that the pilot study was valued in the local community. Although community-based participatory research that originates within a community may be preferable, we demonstrate the utility of a community-partnered approach to intervention design in a vulnerable population. This model could assist researchers who wish to engage the local community to help develop a preliminary idea for a health-related intervention.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesBlack or African AmericanExercise TherapyAdultAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsCommunity engagementCultural relevancePhysical activityResistance trainingWalking

Identifiers

PMID32410065
OpenAlexW3025009382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.