Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409994›Full record

ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2020

Callitrichid responses to dead and dying infants: the effects of paternal bonding and cause of death.

Cynthia L Thompson, Rebecca Hrit, Leonardo C O Melo, Christopher J Vinyard, Kimberly N Bottenberg, Maria A B de Oliveira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maternal death and offspring fitness in multiple wild primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia L ThompsonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA. thompscy@gvsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-8626
Rebecca HritDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA.
Leonardo C O MeloDepartamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Christopher J VinyardDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7355-5192
Kimberly N BottenbergDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA.
Maria A B de OliveiraDepartamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation GVSU-2017National Science Foundation BCS-1561055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many primates show responses to dead infants, yet testing explanations for these behaviors has been difficult. Callitrichids present a unique opportunity to delineate between hypotheses, since unlike most species, male caretakers form closer social bonds with infants than mothers. Callitrichids are also known to commit infanticide, leaving obvious wounds that may enable them to more readily recognize death. We present: (1) a case study of a wild common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) group responding to an infant's natural death, and (2) a review of published infant deaths across callitrichids (N = 16), testing for trends in the sex of reacting individuals and cause of death. In our case study, several group members frequently interacted with the dead infant, attempting to carry it. However, the strongest response was from a male that remained with the corpse for ~ 3 h, despite his group leaving the area. Across callitrichid species, corpse interactions were significantly sex-biased: 100% (N = 6) of accidental deaths involved corpse interaction by males (p = 0.007), compared to 60% (N = 3 of 5) by females (p = 0.095). Cause of death also played a significant role, with individuals attempting to carry dead infants in 100% (N = 6) of accidental deaths, but only 11.1% (N = 1 of 9) of infanticides (p = 0.001). Although the available literature is small and potentially subject to publication biases, these data support the idea that visually obvious wounds may influence callitrichids' perception of dead conspecifics. Additionally, male-biased patterns of corpse interaction in callitrichids indicate that social bonds likely shape reactions to the dead, in addition to kinship. While published data on primate thanatology are limited, this study demonstrates quantitative approaches that can provide empirical insights into primates' responses to dead conspecifics.

Indexed as

DeathObject AttachmentSocial BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsBrazilCallithrixFathersFemaleMaleMothersThanatologyAnimacy detectionDead-infant carryingDeathInfanticideMarmosetQuantitative methodsThanatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.