Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409981›Full record

Trial reportDrugs in R&D2020

Intravenous Tramadol is Effective in the Management of Postoperative Pain Following Abdominoplasty: A Three-Arm Randomized Placebo- and Active-Controlled Trial.

Harold Minkowitz, Hernan Salazar, David Leiman, Daneshvari Solanki, Lucy Lu, Scott Reines, Michael Ryan, Mark Harnett, Neil Singla

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harold MinkowitzClinical Investigation, HD Research, LLC, Bellaire, TX, USA.
Hernan SalazarClinical Investigation, Endeavor Clinical Trials, HD, San Antonio, TX, USA.
David LeimanClinical Investigation, HD Research, LLC, Bellaire, TX, USA.
Daneshvari SolankiClinical Investigation, HD Research, LLC, Bellaire, TX, USA.
Lucy LuClinical Research, Avenue Therapeutics, 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10036, USA. llu@avenuetx.com.
Scott ReinesClinical Research, Avenue Therapeutics, 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10036, USA.
Michael RyanClinical Research, Avenue Therapeutics, 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10036, USA.
Mark HarnettClinical Research, Avenue Therapeutics, 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10036, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-3398
Neil SinglaClinical Investigation, Lotus Clinical Research, LLC, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Therapeutics Clinical Research · USClinical Trials of Texas · USLotus Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveOral tramadol, an atypical opioid approved in the United States (US) since 1995 and a Schedule IV controlled substance, has less abuse liability compared to Schedule II conventional opioids. Intravenous (IV) tramadol is not available in the US, but has the potential to fill a gap between non-opioid medications and conventional opioids for treatment of acute pain. This study evaluates IV tramadol in the management of postoperative pain compared to placebo and standard-of-care active control.

methodsA phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, three-arm, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 50 mg IV tramadol versus placebo and 4 mg IV morphine over 48 h in patients with postoperative pain following abdominoplasty surgery.

resultsIV tramadol was statistically superior (p < 0.05) to placebo and comparable to IV morphine for the primary and all key secondary efficacy outcomes and demonstrated numerically lower rates for the incidence of most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) compared to morphine. No unexpected findings were observed for TEAEs, laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms (ECGs). Over 90% of patients completed the study.

conclusionThe study demonstrated that IV tramadol 50 mg is highly effective in the management of postoperative pain following abdominoplasty. The consistency of effects between tramadol and morphine (as compared to placebo) for primary and key secondary endpoints validates the efficacy of tramadol observed. The study also provided direct evidence of improved tolerability of IV tramadol over a standard-of-care conventional Schedule II opioid. IV tramadol may become a useful option in patients where exposure to conventional opioids is not desired.

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePostoperative PainTramadolTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineTramadol

Identifiers

PMID32409981
PMCPMC7419412
OpenAlexW3024293448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.