ArticleNanoscale2020
Exploring the limits of sensitivity for strain gauges of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride decorated with metallic nanoislands.
Article in Nanoscale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Metallic Nanoislands on Graphene for Biomechanical Sensing.ACS omega · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to clarify the mechanism of piezoresistance in a class of ultra-sensitive strain gauges based on metallic films on 2D substrates ("2D/M" films). The metals used are gold or palladium deposited as ultrathin films (≤16 nm). These films transition from a regime of subcontiguous growth to a percolated morphology with increasing nominal thickness. The 2D substrates are either single-layer graphene or hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). By using either a conductor (graphene) or an insulator (hBN), it is possible to de-couple the relative contributions of the metal and the 2D substrate from the overall piezoresistance of the composite structure. Here, we use a combination of measurements including electron microscopy, automated image analysis, temperature-dependent conductivity, and measurements of gauge factor of the films as they are bent over a 1 μm step edge (0.0001% or 1 ppm). Our observations are enumerated as follows: (1) of the four permutations of metal and 2D substrate, all combinations except hBN/Au are able to resolve 1 ppm strain (considered extraordinary for strain gauges) at some threshold thickness of metal; (2) for non-contiguous (i.e., unpercolated) films of metal on hBN, changes in resistance for these small step strains cannot be detected; (3) for percolated films on hBN, changes in resistance upon strain can be resolved only for palladium and not for gold; (4) graphene does not exhibit detectable changes in resistance when subjected to step strains of either 1 or 10 ppm, but does so upon the deposition of any amount of gold or palladium, even for nominal thicknesses below the threshold for percolation. Our observations reveal unexpected complexity in the properties of these simple composite materials, and ways in which these materials might be combined to exhibit even greater sensitivity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.