Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention.

Maja D Foldal, Alejandro O Blenkmann, Anaïs Llorens, Robert T Knight, Anne-Kristin Solbakk, Tor Endestad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maja D FoldalDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. maja.foldal@gmail.com.
Alejandro O BlenkmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anaïs LlorensDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Robert T KnightDepartment of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
Anne-Kristin SolbakkDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tor EndestadDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Attention, Orientation and the Human Prefrontal CortexR01NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 1985 to 2026
$6.5M
ATTENTION, ORIENTATION, & THE HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEXR37NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2013 to 2019
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021135NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS021135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain responds to violations of expected rhythms, due to extraction- and prediction of the temporal structure in auditory input. Yet, it is unknown how probability of rhythm violations affects the overall rhythm predictability. Another unresolved question is whether predictive processes are independent of attention processes. In this study, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to rhythmic sequences. Predictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones in the rhythm. When SOA deviants were inserted rarely, predictability remained high, whereas predictability was lower with more frequent SOA deviants. Dichotic tone-presentation allowed for independent manipulation of attention, as specific tones of the rhythm were presented to separate ears. Attention was manipulated by instructing subjects to attend to tones in one ear only, while keeping the rhythmic structure of tones constant. The analyses of event-related potentials revealed an attenuated N1 for tones when rhythm predictability was high, while the N1 was enhanced by attention to tones. Bayesian statistics revealed no interaction between predictability and attention. A right-lateralization of attention effects, but not predictability effects, suggested potentially different cortical processes. This is the first study to show that probability of rhythm violation influences rhythm predictability, independent of attention.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAcoustic StimulationAdultBrainBrain MappingData AnalysisElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32409738
PMCPMC7224206
OpenAlexW3025012776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.