Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409620›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Distinguishing the Neural Correlates of Perceptual Awareness and Postperceptual Processing.

Michael A Cohen, Kevin Ortego, Andrew Kyroudis, Michael Pitts

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  5. Motivation biases behavior but not perception.Communications psychology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Behavioral, experiential, and physiological signatures of mind blanking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visual and auditory attention in individuals with DYRK1A and SCN2A disruptive variants.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Momentary Dissociation in the Sensory Cortex: A Neurophysiological Review and its Implications for Maladaptive Daydreaming.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Isolating Neural Signatures of Conscious Speech Perception with a No-Report Sine-Wave Speech Paradigm.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A CohenDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 mcohen@amherst.edu atmpitts@reed.edu.
Kevin OrtegoDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202-8199.
Andrew KyroudisDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202-8199.
Michael PittsDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202-8199 mcohen@amherst.edu atmpitts@reed.edu.
Reed College · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify the neural correlates of perceptual awareness, researchers often compare the differences in neural activation between conditions in which an observer is or is not aware of a stimulus. While intuitive, this approach often contains a critical limitation: to link brain activity with perceptual awareness, observers traditionally report the contents of their perceptual experience. However, relying on observers' reports is problematic because it is difficult to know whether the neural responses being measured are associated with conscious perception or with postperceptual processes involved in the reporting task (e.g., working memory, decision-making). To address this issue, we combined a standard visual masking paradigm with a recently developed "no-report" paradigm in male/female human participants. In the visual masking paradigm, observers saw images of animals and objects that were visible or invisible, depending on their proximity to masks. Meanwhile, on half of the trials, observers reported the contents of their perceptual experience (i.e., report condition), while on the other half of trials they refrained from reporting about their experiences (i.e., no-report condition). We used electroencephalography to examine how visibility interacts with reporting by measuring the P3b event-related potential, one of the proposed canonical "signatures" of conscious processing. Overall, we found a robust P3b in the report condition, but no P3b whatsoever in the no-report condition. This finding suggests that the P3b itself is not a neural signature of conscious processing and highlights the importance of carefully distinguishing the neural correlates of perceptual awareness from postperceptual processing.

Indexed as

AdultAwarenessBrainConsciousnessElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleHumansMalePerceptual MaskingVisual PerceptionYoung AdultattentionawarenessconsciousnessEEGperceptionvision

Identifiers

PMID32409620
PMCPMC7326348
OpenAlexW3024652204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.