Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409601›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Mariko Kikuchi, Toshiya Nishimura, Satoshi Ishishita, Yoichi Matsuda, Minoru Tanaka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Zoological research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Direct male development in chromosomally ZZ zebrafish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Functional Modules in Gametogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariko KikuchiDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, 464-8602 Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiya NishimuraDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, 464-8602 Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi IshishitaAvian Bioscience Research Center, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, 464-8601 Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4440-4878
Yoichi MatsudaAvian Bioscience Research Center, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, 464-8601 Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8720-6105
Minoru TanakaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, 464-8602 Nagoya, Japan; mtanaka@bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germ cells have the ability to differentiate into eggs and sperm and must determine their sexual fate. In vertebrates, the mechanism of commitment to oogenesis following the sexual fate decision in germ cells remains unknown.

Indexed as

OogenesisAnimalsFemaleFish ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm CellsGonadsMaleMeiosisOryziasOvarian FollicleSex Determination ProcessesSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaFish Proteinsfbxo47foxl3germline sex determinationoogenesis commitmentrec8a

Identifiers

PMID32409601
PMCPMC7275758
OpenAlexW3024595359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.