Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32409312›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Fast Stent Retrieval Improves Recanalization Rates of Thrombectomy: Experimental Study on Different Thrombi.

S Soize, L Pierot, M Mirza, G Gunning, M Gilvarry, M Gawlitza, D Vivien, M Zuber, E Touzé

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A novel method for preparing clot analogs under dynamic vortical flow for testing mechanical thrombectomy devices.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In vitro models for the experimental evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy devices in acute ischemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S SoizeFrom the Department of Neuroradiology (S.S., L.P., M. Gawlitza), Hôpital Maison Blanche, Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France ssoize@chu-reims.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-661X
L PierotFrom the Department of Neuroradiology (S.S., L.P., M. Gawlitza), Hôpital Maison Blanche, Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2523-4909
M MirzaNeuravi/Cerenovus (M.M., G.G., M. Gilvarry), Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7721-4774
G GunningNeuravi/Cerenovus (M.M., G.G., M. Gilvarry), Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-9898
M GilvarryNeuravi/Cerenovus (M.M., G.G., M. Gilvarry), Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3975-3531
M GawlitzaFrom the Department of Neuroradiology (S.S., L.P., M. Gawlitza), Hôpital Maison Blanche, Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-3352
D VivienUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S 1237 Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (S.S., D.V., E.T.), National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Normandie University, Université Caen Normandie, Cyceron, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-2185
M ZuberDepartment of Neurology (M.Z.), Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-2746
E TouzéUnité Mixte de Recherche (UMR)-S 1237 Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders (S.S., D.V., E.T.), National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Normandie University, Université Caen Normandie, Cyceron, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-2162
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCOPE Galway · IENormandie Université · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAbout 20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-artery occlusion do not achieve recanalization with mechanical thrombectomy. We aimed to determine whether the speed of retrieval of the stent retriever influences the efficacy in removing different clot types. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty mechanical thrombectomies were performed using an in vitro pulsatile cerebrovascular circulation model with controlled pressure and flow rate. Experiments were dichotomized into fast and slow retrieval using a wedging technique, in which the stent retriever and distal catheter are retrieved together. We used 3 different clot types: erythrocyte-rich, fibrin-rich, and friable clots. Primary end points were complete (TICI 3) and successful (TICI 2b-3) recanalizations. Secondary measures were distal and new territory embolizations.

resultsFast retrieval was more frequently associated with complete (RR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-2.99) and successful recanalization (RR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.03-2.19) than slow retrieval, without a difference in distal embolization (RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.29-1.90). There were no emboli in a new territory. The advantage of fast retrieval over slow retrieval differed according to the clot composition, with a stronger effect with fibrin-rich clots with regard to complete (RR = 4.00; 95% CI, 1.11-14.35;

conclusionsIn our experimental model, a fast removal improved recanalization rates of mechanical thrombectomy, especially in the case of fibrin-rich clots. An in vivo confirmation is warranted to see whether our findings can have an impact in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicAgedBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansMaleStrokeThrombectomyThrombosisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32409312
PMCPMC7342735
OpenAlexW3025205751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.