Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408874›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2020

Women's knowledge towards neonatal danger signs and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asmamaw Demis, Getnet Gedefaw, Adam Wondmieneh, Addisu Getie, Birhan Alemnew

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asmamaw DemisDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O. Box:400, Woldia, Ethiopia. asmamawdemis@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-8642
Getnet GedefawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O.Box:400, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Adam WondmienehDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O. Box:400, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Addisu GetieDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O. Box:400, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Birhan AlemnewDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, P.O.Box:400, Woldia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReducing neonatal mortality is an essential part of the third Sustainable Development Goal, to end preventable child deaths. Neonatal danger signs are the most common cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. In Ethiopia, most babies are born at home or are discharged from the health institutions in the first 24 h, as a result enhancing women's knowledge towards neonatal danger signs and its complication might reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the women knowledge towards neonatal danger signs in Ethiopia.

methodMEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, Google scholar, web of science electronic databases and grey literature from repository were searched for all the available studies. Fourteen cross sectional studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the evidence of heterogeneity. Cochrane I

resultFourteen cross-sectional studies with a total of 6617 study participants were included for this study. The overall pooled prevalence of women's knowledge towards neonatal danger sign was 40.7% (95%CI, 25.72, 55.67). Having higher educational status of the women (AOR = 3.86, 95%CI: 2.3-6.5), having higher educational status of the husband (AOR = 4.57, 95%CI: 3.29-6.35), access to mass media (AOR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.17-2.23), having antenatal care visits (AOR = 2.63, 95%CI: 1.13-4.67), having postnatal care follow up (AOR = 2.55, 95%CI; 1.72-3.79) and giving birth at health institutions (AOR = 2.51, 95%CI:1.68-3.74) were factors associated with knowledge of the women towards danger sign of the neonate.

conclusionIn this systematic review and meta-analysis the pooled prevalence of maternal knowledge towards neonatal danger sign was low. Educational status of the mother, educational status of the husband, access to mass media, antenatal care follow-up, postnatal care follow-up and place of delivery were factors associated with knowledge of the mother towards danger sign of the newborn. Promoting antenatal care, postnatal care follow-up and community-based health information dissemination about neonatal danger signs should be strengthened. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019132179.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrenatal CareChildCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyDanger signsEthiopiaNewbornSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32408874
PMCPMC7222534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.