Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408871›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia.

Tina Lavender, Carol Bedwell, Kieran Blaikie, Valentina Actis Danna, Chris Sutton, Chowa Tembo Kasengele, Sabina Wakasiaka, Bellington Vwalika, Rose Laisser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding the complexities of unexplained stillbirth in sub-Saharan Africa: a mixed-methods study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tina LavenderJean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK. Tina.lavender@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-4956
Carol BedwellJean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK.
Kieran BlaikieJean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK.
Valentina Actis DannaJean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK.
Chris SuttonJean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M139PL, UK.
Chowa Tembo KasengeleMinistry of Health Headquarters, Department of Public Health and Research, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sabina WakasiakaUniversity of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bellington VwalikaUniversity of Zambia ,School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rose LaisserArchbishop Antony Mayala School of Nursing, Catholic University of Health and Allied Health Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 16/137/53
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely intrapartum referral between facilities is pivotal in reducing maternal/neonatal mortality and morbidity but is distressing to women, resource-intensive and likely to cause delays in care provision. We explored the complexities around referrals to gain understanding of the characteristics, experiences and outcomes of those being transferred.

methodsWe used a mixed-method parallel convergent design, in Tanzania and Zambia. Quantitative data were collected from a consecutive, retrospective case-note review (target, n = 2000); intrapartum transfers and stillbirths were the outcomes of interest. A grounded theory approach was adopted for the qualitative element; data were collected from semi-structured interviews (n = 85) with women, partners and health providers. Observations (n = 33) of transfer were also conducted. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, followed by binary logistic regression models, with multiple imputation for missing data. Qualitative data were analysed using Strauss's constant comparative approach.

resultsIntrapartum transfer rates were 11% (111/998; 2 unknown) in Tanzania and 37% (373/996; 1 unknown) in Zambia. Main reasons for transfer were prolonged/obstructed labour and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Women most likely to be transferred were from Zambia (as opposed to Tanzania), HIV positive, attended antenatal clinic < 4 times and living > 30 min away from the referral hospital. Differences were observed between countries. Of those transferred, delays in care were common and an increase in poor outcomes was observed. Qualitative findings identified three categories: social threats to successful transfer, barriers to timely intrapartum care and reparative interventions which were linked to a core category: journey of vulnerability.

conclusionAlthough intrapartum transfers are inevitable, modifiable factors exist with the potential to improve the experience and outcomes for women. Effective transfers rely on adequate resources, effective transport infrastructures, social support and appropriate decision-making. However, women's (and families) vulnerability can be reduced by empathic communication, timely assessment and a positive birth outcome; this can improve women's resilience and influence positive decision-making, for the index and future pregnancy.

Indexed as

Patient TransferAdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesStillbirthTanzaniaYoung AdultZambiaCase note reviewGrounded theoryIntrapartumMixed-methodsObservationQualitativeTanzaniaTransfersZambia

Identifiers

PMID32408871
PMCPMC7222428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.