Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408764›Full record

ArticleCirculation2020

Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Acute Myocardial Infarction as a Novel Hospital-Level Performance Metric for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Ambarish Pandey, Neil Keshvani, Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin, Yubo Gao, Saket Girotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ambarish Pandey *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (A.P., N.K.).
Neil Keshvani *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (A.P., N.K.).
Mary S Vaughan-SarrazinCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa (M.S.V.-S., Y.G., S.G.).
Yubo GaoCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa (M.S.V.-S., Y.G., S.G.).
Saket GirotraCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa (M.S.V.-S., Y.G., S.G.).

Funding

Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Patterns, Consequences, and GuidanceR01AG055663 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI VAUGHAN SARRAZIN, MARY S · 2017 to 2019
$844k
Post-Resuscitation Care and Survival After In-hospital Cardiac ArrestK08HL122527 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GIROTRA, SAKET · 2014 to 2018
$731k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL122527NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe utility of 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) as a hospital performance metric has been a matter of debate. Home time is a patient-centered outcome measure that accounts for rehospitalization, mortality, and postdischarge care. We aim to characterize risk-adjusted 30-day home time in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as a hospital-level performance metric and to evaluate associations with 30-day RSRR, 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), and 1-year RSMR.

methodsThe study included 984 612 patients with AMI hospitalization across 2379 hospitals between 2009 and 2015 derived from 100% Medicare claims data. Home time was defined as the number of days alive and spent outside of a hospital, skilled nursing facility, or intermediate-/long-term acute care facility 30 days after discharge. Correlations between hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time and 30-day RSRR, 30-day RSMR, and 1-year RSMR were estimated with the Pearson correlation. Reclassification in hospital performance using 30-day home time versus 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR was also evaluated.

resultsMedian hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time was 24.0 days (range, 15.3-29.0 days). Hospitals with higher home time were more commonly academic centers, had available cardiac surgery and rehabilitation services, and had higher AMI volume and percutaneous coronary intervention use during the AMI hospitalization. Of the mean 30-day home time days lost, 58% were to intermediate-/long-term care or skilled nursing facility stays (4.7 days), 30% to death (2.5 days), and 12% to readmission (1.0 days). Hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time was inversely correlated with 30-day RSMR (

conclusionsThirty-day home time for patients with AMI can be assessed as a hospital-level performance metric with the use of Medicare claims data. It varies across hospitals, is associated with postdischarge readmission and mortality outcomes, and meaningfully reclassifies hospital performance compared with the 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR metrics.

Indexed as

MedicarePatient ReadmissionAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionPatient DischargePatient Outcome AssessmentRisk AdjustmentUnited Statesmortalitymyocardial infarctionoutcome assessment, health carepatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID32408764
PMCPMC9364938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.