Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408698›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Assessing Influence Mechanism of Green Utilization of Agricultural Wastes in Five Provinces of China through Farmers' Motivation-Cognition-Behavior.

Liying Yu, Hongda Liu, Ardjouman Diabate, Yuyao Qian, Hagan Sibiri, Bing Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liying YuSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8570-7181
Hongda LiuSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Ardjouman DiabateSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0128-3642
Yuyao QianSchool of Foreign Languages, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Hagan SibiriSchool of International Relations and Public Affairs, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Bing YanSchool of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the theory of motivation, and the theory of planned behavior, this study establishes the "motivation-cognition-behavior" model of green utilization of agricultural waste from the perspective of farmers. In the motivational dimension, eight motivational factors were determined in three sub-dimensions of extrinsic motivation. In the cognitive dimension, three sub-dimensions of subjective norms, behavioral attitude, and perceived behavioral control are also determined. In the behavioral dimension, two sub-dimensions of utilization intention and utilization behavior are specified. Methodologically, a questionnaire on the green utilization of agricultural waste of 704 peasant households in five provinces of Jiangsu, Anhui, Shaanxi, Gansu, and Sichuan was administered. With the help of the structural equation model, the influence path and the internal mechanism was then analyzed. It is shown that: (1) in relation to the "motivational dimension → cognitive dimension," extrinsic motivation significantly promotes the cultivation of farmers' subjective norms, in which positive broken windows theory has a positive effect. In contrast, negative broken windows theory has a negative one. In intrinsic motivation, the behavior attitude of farmers is negative. In the response analysis, farmers can realize that their ability, self-efficacy, response efficacy, and response cost all have a positive impact on farmers' perceived behavioral control. (2) In relation of the "cognitive dimension → behavioral dimension," behavioral attitude slightly hinders utilization intention, while subjective norms and perceived behavioral control all contribute to a stronger utilization intention; the utilization intention maintains a positive correlation with the utilization behavior.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmersMotivationRefuse DisposalChinaCognitionHumansIntentionRecyclingSurveys and Questionnairesagricultural wastefarmersgreen utilizationinfluence mechanismmotivation-cognition-behaviorstructural equation model

Identifiers

PMID32408698
PMCPMC7277731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.