ArticleMicromachines2020
Concentration Gradient Constructions Using Inertial Microfluidics for Studying Tumor Cell-Drug Interactions.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of hydrogels in 3D tumor microenvironment modeling and drug screening for cervical cancer: A review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Mechano-Organ-on-Chip for Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Single-Cell Analysis with Spatiotemporal Control of Local pH.ACS measurement science au · 2025Article
- Design and fabrication of novel microfluidic-based droplets for drug screening on a chronic myeloid leukemia cell line.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multi-Organs-on-Chips for Testing Small-Molecule Drugs: Challenges and Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous development of cancer therapy, conventional animal models have exposed a series of shortcomings such as ethical issues, being time consuming and having an expensive cost. As an alternative method, microfluidic devices have shown advantages in drug screening, which can effectively shorten experimental time, reduce costs, improve efficiency, and achieve a large-scale, high-throughput and accurate analysis. However, most of these microfluidic technologies are established for narrow-range drug-concentration screening based on sensitive but limited flow rates. More simple, easy-to operate and wide-ranging concentration-gradient constructions for studying tumor cell-drug interactions in real-time have remained largely out of reach. Here, we proposed a simple and compact device that can quickly construct efficient and reliable drug-concentration gradients with a wide range of flow rates. The dynamic study of concentration-gradient formation based on successive spiral mixer regulations was investigated systematically and quantitatively. Accurate, stable, and controllable dual drug-concentration gradients were produced to evaluate simultaneously the efficacy of the anticancer drug against two tumor cell lines (human breast adenocarcinoma cells and human cervical carcinoma cells). Results showed that paclitaxel had dose-dependent effects on the two tumor cell lines under the same conditions, respectively. We expect this device to contribute to the development of microfluidic chips as a portable and economical product in terms of the potential of concentration gradient-related biochemical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.