Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408139›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Trends in U.S. women's binge drinking in middle adulthood by socioeconomic status, 2006-2018.

Sarah C McKetta, Katherine M Keyes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age and Sex Differences in Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah C McKettaDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: scm2170@columbia.edu.
Katherine M KeyesDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

As adolescent substance use declines, internalizing symptoms increase: identifying high-risk substance using groups and the role of social media, parental supervision, and unsupervised timeR01DA048853 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KEYES, KATHERINE M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Age, period, and cohort effects on gender differences in alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in 47 national, longitudinally-followed cohortsR01AA026861 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JAGER, JUSTIN O, KEYES, KATHERINE M. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026861NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinge drinking causes injury and illness. Prevalence of binge drinking doubled in 2006-2018 for women in middle adulthood (ages 30 s and 40 s); these are the first cohorts for whom attaining higher education and income (both associated with increased alcohol use) are highly prevalent. It is unknown whether recent trends in binge drinking among US women aged 30-49 differ by socio-economic status (SES).

methodsWe examined trends in binge drinking using nationally-representative National Health Interview Surveys (2006-2018) for women age 30-49 (N = 63,426), by education (<high school, high school, some college, college, >college) and family income (<100 %, 100-199 %, 200-399 %, and >400 % of poverty line), controlling for age and race.

resultsThe odds of binge drinking increased among all women approximately 7 % annually from 2006 to 2018. The magnitude of the change increased with education; the predicted probability of binge drinking among women at lowest levels of education increased from 10 % to 13 % from 2006 to 2018 (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.02, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.04), and those with the highest education from 13%-32% (AOR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.08-1.12). Women at the lowest income increased binge drinking from 12 % to 16 % (AOR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.01-1.05) and highest income from 17 % to 36 % (AOR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.07-1.10). Interactions between education (F

conclusionsNationally, women at all levels of SES increased binge drinking, but increases were most pronounced among high SES women.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultAlcohol DrinkingBinge DrinkingEducational StatusFemaleHumansIncomeMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited StatesAlcoholBinge drinkingSocio-economic statusSubstance abuseWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID32408139
PMCPMC7293936
OpenAlexW3022177586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.