Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32408120›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2020

Protein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Ben P Phillips, Natalia Gomez-Navarro, Elizabeth A Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Collagen IV biosynthesis: Intracellular choreography of post-translational modifications.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The endoplasmic reticulum as an active liquid network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben P PhillipsMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Natalia Gomez-NavarroMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Elizabeth A MillerMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: emiller@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misfolded and mistargeted proteins in the early secretory pathway present significant risks to the cell. A diverse and integrated network of quality control pathways protects the cell from these threats. We focus on the discovery of new mechanisms that contribute to this protective network. Biochemical and structural advances in endoplasmic reticulum targeting fidelity, and in the redistribution of mistargeted substrates are discussed. We further review new discoveries in quality control at the inner nuclear membrane in the context of orphaned subunits. We consider developments in our understanding of cargo selection for endoplasmic reticulum export. Conflicting data on quality control by cargo receptor proteins are discussed and we look to important future questions for the field.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic ReticulumHumansMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalProtein FoldingSecretory PathwayMembrane ProteinsEndoplasmic reticulumProtein quality control

Identifiers

PMID32408120
PMCPMC7588826
OpenAlexW3024099505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.