ArticleNeuroImage2020
No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows.
Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05222594 (Computational Neuroscience of Language Processing in the Human Brain), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Computational Neuroscience of Language Processing in the Human Brain
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- A language network in the individualized functional connectomes of 1199 human brains doing arbitrary tasks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Hybrid spatial organization and evidence for magnitude-independent neural coding of linguistic information during sentence production.Science advances · 2026Article
- Sign language narrative reveals universal and modality-specific features of cortical timescale hierarchy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Precision fMRI reveals that the language network exhibits adult-like left-hemispheric lateralization by 4 years of age.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural Coding of Multiple Linguistic Components During Reading Comprehension Across Development.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Feature similarity, a sensitive method to capture the functional interaction of brain regions and networks to support flexible behavior.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A distinct set of brain areas process prosody-the melody of speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Temporal integration in human auditory cortex is predominantly yoked to absolute time.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Parallel Architecture: From Problems and Mysteries to Solutions and Explanations.Topics in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Precision fMRI reveals that the language network exhibits adult-like left-hemispheric lateralization by 4 years of age.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Hybrid spatial organization and magnitude-independent coding of linguistic information during sentence production.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- EPS mid-career prize: An integrated framework for the learning, recognition and interpretation of words.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Review
- Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Auditory areas are recruited for naturalistic visual meaning in early deaf people.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- The Brain's Topographical Organization Shapes Dynamic Interaction Patterns That Support Flexible Behavior Based on Rules and Long-Term Knowledge.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "core language network" consists of left frontal and temporal regions that are selectively engaged in linguistic processing. Whereas functional differences among these regions have long been debated, many accounts propose distinctions in terms of representational grain-size-e.g., words vs. phrases/sentences-or processing time-scale, i.e., operating on local linguistic features vs. larger spans of input. Indeed, the topography of language regions appears to overlap with a cortical hierarchy reported by Lerner et al. (2011) wherein mid-posterior temporal regions are sensitive to low-level features of speech, surrounding areas-to word-level information, and inferior frontal areas-to sentence-level information and beyond. However, the correspondence between the language network and this hierarchy of "temporal receptive windows" (TRWs) is difficult to establish because the precise anatomical locations of language regions vary across individuals. To directly test this correspondence, we first identified language regions in each participant with a well-validated task-based localizer, which confers high functional resolution to the study of TRWs (traditionally based on stereotactic coordinates); then, we characterized regional TRWs with the naturalistic story listening paradigm of Lerner et al. (2011), which augments task-based characterizations of the language network by more closely resembling comprehension "in the wild". We find no region-by-TRW interactions across temporal and inferior frontal regions, which are all sensitive to both word-level and sentence-level information. Therefore, the language network as a whole constitutes a unique stage of information integration within a broader cortical hierarchy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.