Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407898›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction2020

Post-natal follow-up for women and neonates during the COVID-19 pandemic: French National Authority for Health recommendations.

Alexandre J Vivanti, Philippe Deruelle, Olivier Picone, Sophie Guillaume, Jean-Christophe Roze, Blandine Mulin, Fabienne Kochert, Isabelle De Beco, Sophie Mahut, Adrien Gantois and 5 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. COVID-19 guidelines for pregnant women and new mothers: A systematic evidence review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexandre J VivantiService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France. Electronic address: alexandre.vivanti@aphp.fr.
Philippe DeruelleCollège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français, France; Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Faculté de Médecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier PiconeCollège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français, France; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Louis Mourier" Hospital, Paris University, IAME INSERM U1137, APHP Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche sur les Infections pendant la Grossesse.
Sophie GuillaumeCollège National des Sages-Femmes de France, France.
Jean-Christophe RozeConseil National des Professionnels de Pédiatrie, France.
Blandine MulinFrench Federation of Perinatal Health Networks, France.
Fabienne KochertFrench Association of Ambulatory Paediatrics, France.
Isabelle De BecoCollege of General Medicine, France.
Sophie MahutCollege of General Medicine, France.
Adrien GantoisCollège National des Sages-Femmes de France, France.
Chloé BarasinskiCollège National des Sages-Femmes de France, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, SIGMA, INSTITUT PASCAL, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Karine PetitprezGuidelines Department, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France.
Anne-Françoise Pauchet-TraversatGuidelines Department, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France.
Alcyone DroyGuidelines Department, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France.
Alexandra BenachiService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France; Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the context of the stage 3 SARS-Cov-2 epidemic situation, it is necessary to put forward a method of rapid response for an HAS position statement in order to answer to the requests from the French Ministry of Solidarity and Health, healthcare professionals and/or health system users' associations, concerning post-natal follow-up for women and neonates during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA simplified 7-step process that favours HAS collaboration with experts (healthcare professionals, health system users' associations, scientific societies etc.), the restrictive selection of available evidence and the use of digital means of communication. A short and specific dissemination format, which can be quickly updated in view of the changes in available data has been chosen.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAmbulatory CareBreast FeedingContinuity of Patient CareCOVID-19FemaleFranceHumansInfant, NewbornInformation DisseminationNeonatal ScreeningPatient DischargePatient Isolation

Identifiers

PMID32407898
PMCPMC7212945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.