ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Serum angiotensin converting enzyme, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and high sensitive-C reactive protein levels in diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis- where do we stand?
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers and genetic determinants of cardiac sarcoidosis: current status, the unmet needs and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review on the Electrocardiographic Manifestations of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Patterns and Prognosis.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Patient profile and comparison of three diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis in a tuberculosis endemic population.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2022Article
- Etiology of chronic atrioventricular block in young adults in a public university hospital in India.Indian heart journalArticle
- Application of tirofiban in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with diabetes and undergoing emergency interventional therapy.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is increasingly being recognized in the last two decades. The diagnosis of CS depends on clustering of multiple symptoms, investigations and demonstration of a non-caseating granuloma on histopathology. Serum Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (SACE) level, one of the serological markers, is often elevated in systemic sarcoidosis. However, the yield of SACE level among patients with isolated or predominant CS is unclear. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the prevalence of elevated SACE level among patients with proven CS. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom our Granulomatous myocarditis (GM) registry, 45 biopsy proven CS patients were enrolled. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Clinical diagnosis of CS [HRS definition + Lymph Node biopsy/Endomyocardial biopsy (non-caseating granuloma)]. Exclusion criteria - Other causes of GM like cardiac tuberculosis (TB culture/AFB smear -positive) and patients taking medications affecting SACE level.
resultsAmong 143 GM cases, 45 CS were analyzed. Mean age:42 ± 11 years (Range 22-63 years, 19 females). With our laboratory reference of SACE (Normal range: 20-70 U/L), 3 out of 45 (6.7%) patients of CS had elevated SACE. In a comparative analysis we found, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and High sensitive-C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) are much more sensitive, although not specific for CS. Patients with pulmonary involvement more often had elevated SACE level.
conclusionSerum ACE is elevated only in approximately 6.7% of patients with biopsy proven CS. Hence, it is insensitive serological tool for diagnosis of CS even in the active phase of the disease. In contrast, ESR and Hs-CRP emerges to be more sensitive markers of active CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.