Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407714›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2020

Research Techniques Made Simple: Mouse Bacterial Skin Infection Models for Immunity Research.

Christine Youn, Nathan K Archer, Lloyd S Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Skin Microbiome: Current Landscape and Future Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine YounDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nathan K ArcherDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lloyd S MillerDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: lloydmiller@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Training Program In Cellular and Molecular MedicineT32GM135457 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAJINI RAO · 2020 to 2026
$5.4M
IL-36 responses in Staphylococcus aureus driven skin inflammationR01AR073665 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, NATHAN K. · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
STAT3-mediated immunity to Staphylococcus aureus in skinR01AR069502 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHER, NATHAN K. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069502NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073665NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial skin infections are a major societal health burden and are increasingly difficult to treat owing to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains such as community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Understanding the immunologic mechanisms that provide durable protection against skin infections has the potential to guide the development of immunotherapies and vaccines to engage the host immune response to combat these antibiotic-resistant strains. To this end, mouse skin infection models allow researchers to examine host immunity by investigating the timing, inoculum, route of infection and the causative bacterial species in different wild-type mouse backgrounds as well as in knockout, transgenic, and other types of genetically engineered mouse strains. To recapitulate the various types of human skin infections, many different mouse models have been developed. For example, four models frequently used in dermatological research are based on the route of infection, including (i) subcutaneous infection models, (ii) intradermal infection models, (iii) wound infection models, and (iv) epicutaneous infection models. In this article, we will describe these skin infection models in detail along with their advantages and limitations. In addition, we will discuss how humanized mouse models such as the human skin xenograft on immunocompromised mice might be used in bacterial skin infection research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalImmunocompromised HostAnimalsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDResearch DesignSkinSkin TransplantationStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsTransplantation Chimera

Identifiers

PMID32407714
PMCPMC7387158
OpenAlexW3022291921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.