ArticleJournal of proteome research2020
Block Design with Common Reference Samples Enables Robust Large-Scale Label-Free Quantitative Proteome Profiling.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foamy microglia link oxylipins to disease progression in multiple sclerosis.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Navigating the data processing for cytometry-based single-cell proteomics.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Data Processing and Analysis in Positional Proteomics.Proteomics · 2025Review
- JUMPshiny: A User-Friendly Platform for Comprehensive Analysis and Visualization of Quantitative Proteomics Data.Proteomics · 2025Article
- Injectiondesign: web service of plate design with optimized stratified block randomization for modern GC/LC-MS-based sample preparation.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Automated splitting into batches for observational biomedical studies with sequential processing.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- ANPELA: Significantly Enhanced Quantification Tool for Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- HopE and HopD Porin-Mediated Drug Influx Contributes to Intrinsic Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Inhibits Streptomycin Resistance Acquisition by Natural Transformation in Helicobacter pylori.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Proteotyping of knockout mouse strains reveals sex- and strain-specific signatures in blood plasma.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Importance of Block Randomization When Designing Proteomics Experiments.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Label-free quantitative proteomics has become an increasingly popular tool for profiling global protein abundances. However, one major limitation is the potential performance drift of the LC-MS platform over time, which, in turn, limits its utility for analyzing large-scale sample sets. To address this, we introduce an experimental and data analysis scheme based on a block design with common references within each block for enabling large-scale label-free quantification. In this scheme, a large number of samples (e.g., >100 samples) are analyzed in smaller and more manageable blocks, minimizing instrument drift and variability within individual blocks. Each designated block also contains common reference samples (e.g., controls) for normalization across all blocks. We demonstrated the robustness of this approach by profiling the proteome response of human macrophage THP-1 cells to 11 engineered nanomaterials at two different doses. A total of 116 samples were analyzed in six blocks, yielding an average coverage of 4500 proteins per sample. Following a common reference-based correction, 2537 proteins were quantified with high reproducibility without any imputation of missing values from 116 data sets. The data revealed the consistent quantification of proteins across all six blocks, as illustrated by the highly consistent abundances of house-keeping proteins in all samples and the high levels of correlation among samples from different blocks. The data also demonstrated that label-free quantification is robust and accurate enough to quantify even very subtle abundance changes as well as large fold-changes. Our streamlined workflow is easy to implement and can be readily adapted to other large cohort studies for reproducible label-free proteome quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.