Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407532›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Quality of Life With Pembrolizumab for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-040.

Kevin J Harrington, Denis Soulières, Christophe Le Tourneau, Jose Dinis, Lisa F Licitra, Myung-Ju Ahn, Ainara Soria, Jean-Pascal H Machiels, Nicolas Mach, Ranee Mehra and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Redefining oropharyngeal cancer in the HPV era: integrating precision medicine and immunotherapeutic frontiers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Immune Cells in Head-and-Neck Tumor Microenvironments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Frontiers of oral and maxillofacial medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Kevin J HarringtonThe Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Denis SoulièresHôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christophe Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France.
Jose DinisInstituto Português Oncologia, Porto, Portugal.
Lisa F LicitraFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Myung-Ju AhnSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ainara SoriaHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Jean-Pascal H MachielsCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas MachHUG - Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ranee MehraMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Barbara BurtnessYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Misoo C EllisonMerck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Jonathan D ChengMerck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Diana Romana ChirovskyMerck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Ramona F SwabyMerck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Ezra E W CohenMoores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Beau-Séjour · CHHôpital Notre-Dame · CAHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESInserm · FRInstitute of Cancer Research · GBIPO Porto · PTSamsung Medical Center · KRUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Milan · ITYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL); few treatments have demonstrated clinically meaningful HRQoL benefit. KEYNOTE-040 evaluated pembrolizumab vs standard of care (SOC) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC whose disease recurred or progressed after platinum-containing regimen.

methodsPatients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or SOC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). Exploratory HRQoL analyses used European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30 quality-of-life, EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module, and EuroQoL 5-dimensions questionnaires.

resultsThe HRQoL population comprised 469 patients (pembrolizumab = 241, SOC = 228). HRQoL compliance for patients in the study at week 15 was 75.3% (116 of 154) for pembrolizumab and 74.6% (85 of 114) for SOC. The median time to deterioration in global health status (GHS) and QoL scores were 4.8 months with pembrolizumab and 2.8 months with SOC (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 1.05). At week 15, GHS / QoL scores were stable for pembrolizumab (least squares mean [LSM] = 0.39, 95% CI = -3.00 to 3.78) but worsened for SOC (LSM = -5.86, 95% CI = -9.68 to -2.04); the LSM between-group difference was 6.25 points (95% CI = 1.32 to 11.18; nominal 2-sided P = .01). A greater difference in the LSM for GHS / QoL score occurred with pembrolizumab vs docetaxel (10.23, 95% CI = 3.15 to 17.30) compared with pembrolizumab vs methotrexate (6.21, 95% CI = -4.57 to 16.99) or pembrolizumab vs cetuximab (-1.44, 95% CI = -11.43 to 8.56). Pembrolizumab-treated patients had stable functioning and symptoms at week 15, with no notable differences from SOC.

conclusionsGHS / QoL scores were stable with pembrolizumab but declined with SOC in patients at week 15, supporting the clinically meaningful benefit of pembrolizumab in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximabDocetaxelpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID32407532
PMCPMC7850527
OpenAlexW3025698214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.