SynthesisJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2020
Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Characteristics Associated With Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Improvement After Cochlear Implantation.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026Article
- Peripheral Neural Plasticity in Cochlear Implant Users Across the Lifespan.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2026Article
- Using cortical auditory-evoked potential responses to verify the objective benefit of aural rehabilitation in adult cochlear implant users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Accuracy and variability in clinical predictions of speech recognition outcomes for cochlear implant users.International journal of audiology · 2025Article
- Utilization of the Spanish Bisyllable Word Recognition Test to Assess Cochlear Implant Performance Trajectory.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Determinants of Success in Revision Cochlear Implant Surgeries: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Patient, Surgical, and Radiological Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Comorbidities on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Adults under 60.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2025Article
- Individualized post-operative prediction of cochlear implantation outcomes in children with prelingual deafness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Estimation of outer-wall length in optimizing cochlear implantation in malformed inner ears.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- P1 and N1 Characteristics in Individuals with Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss, and Cochlear Implant Users: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2024Article
- Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Otology & neurotology open · 2023Article
- Cochlear Implants for Single-Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Association of Cognitive Impairment Screening Scores With Improvements in Speech Recognition and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2023Article
- Exploring neurocognitive factors and brain activation in adult cochlear implant recipients associated with speech perception outcomes-A scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Multiple studies have evaluated associations between post-cochlear implant (CI) speech recognition outcomes and patient-related factors. Current literature often appears equivocal or contradictory, so little is known about the factors that contribute to successful speech recognition outcomes with CIs. Objective: To use a meta-analysis to pool data from the extant literature and provide an objective summary of existing evidence on associations of patient-related factors and CI speech recognition outcomes. Data Sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases in January 2019 using the following search terms: cochlear implant or cochlear implants or cochlear implantation and speech recognition or word recognition or sentence recognition. Studies of postlingually deafened adult CI recipients that reported word or sentence recognition scores were included. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were postlingual adult CI recipients 18 years or older with word or sentence recognition scores at minimum 6-month postimplantation. Studies that included patients undergoing revision or reimplantation surgery were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 1809 unique articles underwent review by abstract, and 121 articles underwent full-text review, resulting in 13 articles of 1095 patients for a meta-analysis of correlations. Random-effects model was used when the heterogeneity test yielded a low P value (P < .05). Main Outcomes and Measures: The planned primary outcome was the pooled correlation values between postimplant speech recognition scores and patient-related factors. Results: Of the 1095 patients included from the 13 studies, the mean age at implantation ranged from 51.2 to 63.7 years and the mean duration of hearing loss ranged from 9.5 to 31.8 years; for the 825 patients for whom sex was reported, 421 (51.0%) were women. A weak negative correlation was observed between age at implantation and postimplant sentence recognition in quiet (r = -0.31 [95% CI, -0.41 to -0.20]). Other correlations between patient-related factors and postimplant word or sentence recognition were statistically significant, but all correlations were absent to negligible (r = 0.02-0.27). Conclusions and Relevance: Given that most associations were weak, negligible, or absent, patient-related factors often thought to affect CI speech recognition ability offer limited assistance in clinical decision-making in cochlear implantation. Additional research is needed to identify patient-related and other factors that predict CI outcomes, including speech recognition and other important variables related to success with CIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.