Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407423›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sohail Akhtar, Jamal Abdul Nasir, Muhammad Usman, Aqsa Sarwar, Rizwana Majeed, Baki Billah

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sohail AkhtarDepartment of Statistics, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-152X
Jamal Abdul NasirDepartment of Statistics, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad UsmanDepartment of Statistics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Aqsa SarwarDepartment of Statistics, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Rizwana MajeedDepartment of Statistics, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Baki BillahSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Government College University, Lahore · PKMonash University · AUUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the most common bloodborne viral infections reported in Pakistan. Frequent dialysis treatment of hemodialysis patients exposes them to a high risk of HCV infection. The main purpose of this paper is to quantify the prevalence of HCV in hemodialysis patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Pakistani Journals Online and Web of Science to identify studies published between 1 January 1995 and 30 October 2019, reporting on the prevalence of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates. A funnel plot was used in conjunction with Egger's regression test for asymmetry and to assess publication bias. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify potential sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. This review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019159345).

resultsOut of 248 potential studies, 19 studies involving 3446 hemodialysis patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of HCV in hemodialysis patients in Pakistan was 32.33% (95% CI: 25.73-39.30; I2 = 94.3%, p < 0.01). The subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of HCV among hemodialysis patients in Punjab was significantly higher (37.52%; 95% CI: 26.66-49.03; I2 = 94.5, p < 0.01) than 34.42% (95% CI: 14.95-57.05; I2 = 91.3%, p < 0.01) in Baluchistan, 27.11% (95% CI: 15.81-40.12; I2 = 94.5, p < 0.01) in Sindh and 22.61% (95% CI: 17.45-28.2; I2 = 78.6, p < 0.0117) in Khyber Pukhtoonkhuwa.

conclusionsIn this study, we found a high prevalence (32.33%) of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients in Pakistan. Clinically, hemodialysis patients require more attention and resources than the general population. Preventive interventions are urgently needed to decrease the high risk of HCV infection in hemodialysis patients in Pakistan.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CHumansPakistanPrevalenceRenal DialysisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32407423
PMCPMC7224536
OpenAlexW3025892267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.