Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407391›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Preliminary study: Health and performance assessment in broiler chicks following application of six different hatching egg disinfection protocols.

Wiebke Tebrün, Gerzon Motola, Mohamed Hafez Hafez, Josef Bachmeier, Volker Schmidt, Kevin Renfert, Christian Reichelt, Sarah Brüggemann-Schwarze, Michael Pees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Alternative protocols for sanitizing hatching eggs and their effects on the microbiota of eggshell surface and chick yolk sac.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wiebke TebrünUniversity Teaching Hospital, Department for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerzon MotolaInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg, Berlin, Germany.
Mohamed Hafez HafezInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg, Berlin, Germany.
Josef BachmeierBrüterei Süd, Regenstauf, Germany.
Volker SchmidtUniversity Teaching Hospital, Department for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken, Leipzig, Germany.
Kevin RenfertUniversity Teaching Hospital, Department for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian ReicheltUniversity Teaching Hospital, Department for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken, Leipzig, Germany.
Sarah Brüggemann-SchwarzeInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-1645
Michael PeesUniversity Teaching Hospital, Department for Birds and Reptiles, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-9697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a Germany-wide project that evaluates strategies for the reduction of multi-resistant bacteria along the poultry production chain, the impact of different hatching egg disinfectants on hatchability and health of the broiler chicks was evaluated. Animal trials were conducted with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- (ESBL) producing Escherichia (E.) coli contaminated hatching eggs and six disinfection protocols that used formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, low-energy electron irradiation, peracetic acid and an essential oil preparation. Each protocol was tested on a group of 50 chicks. Equally sized positive and negative control groups were carried along for each trial. Hatchability, mortality and body weight were recorded as performance parameters. During necropsy of half of the animals in each group on day 7 and 14 respectively, macroscopic abnormalities, body weight, weights of liver and gut convolute were recorded and a range of tissue samples for histological examination were collected as part of the health assessment. A decrease in hatchability was recorded for spray application of essential oils. Body weight development was overall comparable, in several groups even superior, to the Ross308 performance objectives, but a reduced performance was seen in the hydrogen peroxide group. Histologically, lymphoid follicles were regularly seen in all sampled organs and no consistent differences were observed between contaminated and non-contaminated groups. Significances were infrequently and inconsistently seen. In conclusion, remarkable findings were a decrease in hatchability caused by the essential oils spray application and a reduced body weight development in the hydrogen peroxide group. Therefore, the essential oils preparation as spray application was deemed inappropriate in practice, while the application of hydrogen peroxide was considered in need of further research. The other trial results indicate that the tested hatching egg disinfectants present a possible alternative to formaldehyde.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDisinfectantsDisinfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, MultipleEggsEscherichia coliGermanyHumansOils, VolatileDisinfectantsOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID32407391
PMCPMC7224537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.