Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Monitoring of cardiovascular physiology augmented by a patient-specific biomechanical model during general anesthesia. A proof of concept study.

Arthur Le Gall, Fabrice Vallée, Kuberan Pushparajah, Tarique Hussain, Alexandre Mebazaa, Dominique Chapelle, Étienne Gayat, Radomír Chabiniok

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Direct assessment of total cavopulmonary connection power loss with interventional cardiac magnetic resonance in Fontan circulation.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Arthur Le GallInria, Paris, France.
Fabrice ValléeInria, Paris, France.
Kuberan PushparajahSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tarique HussainDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Alexandre MebazaaAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Lariboisière - Saint Louis - Fernand Widal University Hospitals, Paris, France.
Dominique ChapelleInria, Paris, France.
Étienne GayatAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Lariboisière - Saint Louis - Fernand Widal University Hospitals, Paris, France.
Radomír ChabiniokInria, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7527-2751
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRSouthwestern Medical CenterSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During general anesthesia (GA), direct analysis of arterial pressure or aortic flow waveforms may be inconclusive in complex situations. Patient-specific biomechanical models, based on data obtained during GA and capable to perform fast simulations of cardiac cycles, have the potential to augment hemodynamic monitoring. Such models allow to simulate Pressure-Volume (PV) loops and estimate functional indicators of cardiovascular (CV) system, e.g. ventricular-arterial coupling (Vva), cardiac efficiency (CE) or myocardial contractility, evolving throughout GA. In this prospective observational study, we created patient-specific biomechanical models of heart and vasculature of a reduced geometric complexity for n = 45 patients undergoing GA, while using transthoracic echocardiography and aortic pressure and flow signals acquired in the beginning of GA (baseline condition). If intraoperative hypotension (IOH) appeared, diluted norepinephrine (NOR) was administered and the model readjusted according to the measured aortic pressure and flow signals. Such patients were a posteriori assigned into a so-called hypotensive group. The accuracy of simulated mean aortic pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV) at baseline were in accordance with the guidelines for the validation of new devices or reference measurement methods in all patients. After NOR administration in the hypotensive group, the percentage of concordance with 10% exclusion zone between measurement and simulation was >95% for both MAP and SV. The modeling results showed a decreased Vva (0.64±0.37 vs 0.88±0.43; p = 0.039) and an increased CE (0.8±0.1 vs 0.73±0.11; p = 0.042) in hypotensive vs normotensive patients. Furthermore, Vva increased by 92±101%, CE decreased by 13±11% (p < 0.001 for both) and contractility increased by 14±11% (p = 0.002) in the hypotensive group post-NOR administration. In this work we demonstrated the application of fast-running patient-specific biophysical models to estimate PV loops and functional indicators of CV system using clinical data available during GA. The work paves the way for model-augmented hemodynamic monitoring at operating theatres or intensive care units to enhance the information on patient-specific physiology.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAlgorithmsAnesthesia, GeneralArterial PressureBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood PressureCardiac OutputFemaleHemodynamic MonitoringHumansHypotensionMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineProof of Concept StudyProspective StudiesNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID32407353
PMCPMC7224549
OpenAlexW3024953028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.