ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021
A novel deep learning method for predictive modeling of microbiome data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence driven diet-intestinal microbiota-host health integration: A four-dimensional paradigm for advancing host wellness research.iMetaOmics · 2026Review
- Meta2DB: curated shotgun metagenomic feature sets and metadata for health state prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Prevalence aware feature selection improves biomarker identification in microbiome studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Taxonomic and functional remodeling of the gut microbiota during aging and implications for microbiota-derived biomarkers.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Phylogeny-informed random forests for human microbiome studies.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Deconvolving Phylogenetic Distance Mixtures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting age from binarized human oral microbial data combined with an ensemble of classifiers.mSystems · 2025Article
- Review
- Chronological age estimation from human microbiomes with transformer-based Robust Principal Component Analysis.Communications biology · 2025Article
- DeepBiome: A Phylogenetic Tree Informed Deep Neural Network for Microbiome Data Analysis.Statistics in biosciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantifying uncertainty in microbiome-based prediction using Gaussian processes with microbial community dissimilarities.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Optimizing gene selection and module identification via ontology-based scoring and deep learning.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- IMPACT: interpretable microbial phenotype analysis via microbial characteristic traits.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Constructing phylogenetic trees for microbiome data analysis: A mini-review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- DeepPhylo: Phylogeny-Aware Microbial Embeddings Enhanced Predictive Accuracy in Human Microbiome Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- MicroHDF: predicting host phenotypes with metagenomic data using a deep forest-based framework.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Deep learning for predicting 16S rRNA gene copy number.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deep learning methods in metagenomics: a review.Microbial genomics · 2024Review
- PM-CNN: microbiome status recognition and disease detection model based on phylogeny and multi-path neural network.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development and decreasing cost of next-generation sequencing technologies, the study of the human microbiome has become a rapid expanding research field, which provides an unprecedented opportunity in various clinical applications such as drug response predictions and disease diagnosis. It is thus essential and desirable to build a prediction model for clinical outcomes based on microbiome data that usually consist of taxon abundance and a phylogenetic tree. Importantly, all microbial species are not uniformly distributed in the phylogenetic tree but tend to be clustered at different phylogenetic depths. Therefore, the phylogenetic tree represents a unique correlation structure of microbiome, which can be an important prior to improve the prediction performance. However, prediction methods that consider the phylogenetic tree in an efficient and rigorous way are under-developed. Here, we develop a novel deep learning prediction method MDeep (microbiome-based deep learning method) to predict both continuous and binary outcomes. Conceptually, MDeep designs convolutional layers to mimic taxonomic ranks with multiple convolutional filters on each convolutional layer to capture the phylogenetic correlation among microbial species in a local receptive field and maintain the correlation structure across different convolutional layers via feature mapping. Taken together, the convolutional layers with its built-in convolutional filters capture microbial signals at different taxonomic levels while encouraging local smoothing and preserving local connectivity induced by the phylogenetic tree. We use both simulation studies and real data applications to demonstrate that MDeep outperforms competing methods in both regression and binary classifications. Availability and Implementation: MDeep software is available at https://github.com/lichen-lab/MDeep Contact:chen61@iu.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.