Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32406864›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020

Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers.

Kathryn C Adair, Larissa G Rodriguez-Homs, Sabran Masoud, Paul J Mosca, J Bryan Sexton

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Randomized controlled trial of the "WISER" intervention to reduce healthcare worker burnout.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Maternal and neonatal health care worker well-being and patient safety climate amid the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn C AdairDuke Center for Healthcare Safety and Quality, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4886-0002
Larissa G Rodriguez-HomsDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4998-1519
Sabran MasoudDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7758-3545
Paul J MoscaDuke Network Services Duke University Health System, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-9013
J Bryan SextonDuke Center for Healthcare Safety and Quality, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-2924
Duke University Health System · USDuke University · US

Funding

The WISER StudyR01HD084679 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN, SEXTON, JOHN BRYAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed.

objectiveThis randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter-writing intervention for improving health care workers' well-being.

methodsA total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter-writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples t tests, independent t tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being.

resultsParticipants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (P<.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (P=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (P<.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (P=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (P=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (P=.06) and positive emotion words (P=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (Ps>.05).

conclusionsThis single-exposure gratitude letter-writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressCohort StudiesEmotionsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleProspective Studiesburnoutemotionshealth caremental healthpositive psychology

Identifiers

PMID32406864
PMCPMC7256751
OpenAlexW3021562134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.