Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32406853›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020

COVID-19 and Laparoscopic Surgery: Scoping Review of Current Literature and Local Expertise.

Robert Adrianus de Leeuw, Nicole Birgit Burger, Marcello Ceccaroni, Jian Zhang, Jurriaan Tuynman, Mohamed Mabrouk, Pere Barri Soldevila, Hendrik Jaap Bonjer, Pim Ankum, Judith Huirne

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neuromuscular blockade management in patients with COVID-19.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Robert Adrianus de LeeuwAmsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-7754
Nicole Birgit BurgerAmsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6142-6684
Marcello CeccaroniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carabettere Scientifico Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-4876
Jian ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-5807
Jurriaan TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-8000
Mohamed MabroukCambridge Endometriosis and Endoscopic Surgery Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrook, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-6979
Pere Barri SoldevilaDexeus Mujer, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3369-6262
Hendrik Jaap BonjerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-3483
Pim AnkumDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Research Institute Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-2422
Judith HuirneDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Research Institute Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-2677
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBHospital Universitario Dexeus · ESInternational Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital · CNOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is holding the world in its grip. Epidemiologists have shown that the mortality risks are higher when the health care system is subjected to pressure from COVID-19. It is therefore of great importance to maintain the health of health care providers and prevent contamination. An important group who will be required to treat patients with COVID-19 are health care providers during semiacute surgery. There are concerns that laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of contamination more than open surgery; therefore, balancing the safety of health care providers with the benefit of laparoscopic surgery for the patient is vital.

objectiveWe aimed to provide an overview of potential contamination routes and possible risks for health care providers; we also aimed to propose research questions based on current literature and expert opinions about performing laparoscopic surgery on patients with COVID-19.

methodsWe performed a scoping review, adding five additional questions concerning possible contaminating routes. A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases, adding results from gray literature as well. The search not only included COVID-19 but was extended to virus contamination in general. We excluded society and professional association statements about COVID-19 if they did not add new insights to the available literature.

resultsThe initial search provided 2007 records, after which 267 full-text papers were considered. Finally, we used 84 papers, of which 14 discussed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Eight papers discussed the added value of performing intubation in a low-pressure operating room, mainly based on the SARS outbreak experience in 2003. Thirteen papers elaborated on the risks of intubation for health care providers and SARS-CoV-2, and 19 papers discussed this situation with other viruses. They conclude that there is significant evidence that intubation and extubation is a high-risk aerosol-producing procedure. No papers were found on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 and surgical smoke, although 25 papers did provide conflicting evidence on the infection risk of human papillomavirus, hepatitis B, polio, and rabies. No papers were found discussing tissue extraction or the deflation risk of the pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic surgery.

conclusionsThere seems to be consensus in the literature that intubation and extubation are high-risk procedures for health care providers and that maximum protective equipment is needed. On the other hand, minimal evidence is available of the actual risk of contamination of health care providers during laparoscopy itself, nor of operating room pressure, surgical smoke, tissue extraction, or CO

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansLaparoscopyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRisk Assessmentcorona 2019COVID-19health care providerinfectious diseaselaparoscopyoutbreakpandemicphysiciansurgerysurgical procedures, operative

Identifiers

PMID32406853
PMCPMC7313384
OpenAlexW3025404964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.