ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020
COVID-19 and Laparoscopic Surgery: Scoping Review of Current Literature and Local Expertise.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Trends among patients with endometriosis over a 7-year period and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from an academic high-level endometriosis centre in Germany.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Services in Singapore: Retrospective Quantitative Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2022Article
- Maintaining a minimally invasive surgical service during a pandemic.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on management of urogynaecology patients: a rapid review of the literature.International urogynecology journal · 2021Review
- The PanSurg-PREDICT Study: Endocrine Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Neuromuscular blockade management in patients with COVID-19.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2021Review
- The negative effects of COVID-19 and national lockdown on emergency surgery morbidity due to delayed access.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Article
- Pathogenesis of the inflammatory bowel disease in context of SARS-COV-2 infection.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
- Elective laparoscopic colectomy in a patient 3 weeks after coronavirus disease 2019 infection: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
- Management of urologic cancers during the pandemic and potential impact of treatment deferrals on outcomes.Urologic oncology · 2021Article
- How to manage inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: A guide for the practicing clinician.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Changes in children's surgical services during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary-level government hospital in a lower middle-income country.BMJ paediatrics open · 2021Article
- Impact of Surgical Wait Time on Survival in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With Hydronephrosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Endometriosis Surgery during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Brazilian Single Institution Experience.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Article
- Rapid Scoping Review of Laparoscopic Surgery Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Appraisal Using a Simple Quality Appraisal Tool "EMERGE".The Indian journal of surgery · 2020Review
- Laparoscopic Surgery in COVID-19 Era-Safety and Ethical Issues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is holding the world in its grip. Epidemiologists have shown that the mortality risks are higher when the health care system is subjected to pressure from COVID-19. It is therefore of great importance to maintain the health of health care providers and prevent contamination. An important group who will be required to treat patients with COVID-19 are health care providers during semiacute surgery. There are concerns that laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of contamination more than open surgery; therefore, balancing the safety of health care providers with the benefit of laparoscopic surgery for the patient is vital.
objectiveWe aimed to provide an overview of potential contamination routes and possible risks for health care providers; we also aimed to propose research questions based on current literature and expert opinions about performing laparoscopic surgery on patients with COVID-19.
methodsWe performed a scoping review, adding five additional questions concerning possible contaminating routes. A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases, adding results from gray literature as well. The search not only included COVID-19 but was extended to virus contamination in general. We excluded society and professional association statements about COVID-19 if they did not add new insights to the available literature.
resultsThe initial search provided 2007 records, after which 267 full-text papers were considered. Finally, we used 84 papers, of which 14 discussed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Eight papers discussed the added value of performing intubation in a low-pressure operating room, mainly based on the SARS outbreak experience in 2003. Thirteen papers elaborated on the risks of intubation for health care providers and SARS-CoV-2, and 19 papers discussed this situation with other viruses. They conclude that there is significant evidence that intubation and extubation is a high-risk aerosol-producing procedure. No papers were found on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 and surgical smoke, although 25 papers did provide conflicting evidence on the infection risk of human papillomavirus, hepatitis B, polio, and rabies. No papers were found discussing tissue extraction or the deflation risk of the pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic surgery.
conclusionsThere seems to be consensus in the literature that intubation and extubation are high-risk procedures for health care providers and that maximum protective equipment is needed. On the other hand, minimal evidence is available of the actual risk of contamination of health care providers during laparoscopy itself, nor of operating room pressure, surgical smoke, tissue extraction, or CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.