Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32406313›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2020

Moral distress perspectives among interprofessional intensive care unit team members.

Heather Vincent, Deborah J Jones, Joan Engebretson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New approach to assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit personnel: a case study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Integration of palliative care into acute care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather Vincent6614University of Pittsburgh, USA; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6013-4372
Deborah J Jones12338The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, USA.
Joan Engebretson12340The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Technology Research in Chronic & Critical IllnessT32NR008857 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Young Ji Lee · 2005 to 2026
$4.0M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine interprofessional healthcare professionals' perceptions of triggers and root causes of moral distress.

designQualitative description of open-text comments written on the Moral Distress Scale-Revised survey.

methodsA subset of interprofessional providers from a parent study provided open-text comments that originated from four areas of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, including the margins of the 21-item questionnaire, the designated open-text section, shared perceptions of team communication and dynamics affecting moral distress, and the section addressing an intent to leave a clinical position because of moral distress. Open-text comments were captured, coded, and divided into meaning units and themes using systematic text condensation.

participantsTwenty-eight of the 223 parent study participants completing the Moral Distress Scale-Revised shared comments on situations contributing to moral distress.

resultsAll 28 participants working in the four medical center intensive care units reported feelings of moral distress. Feelings of moral distress were associated with professional anguish over patient care decisions, team, and system-level factors. Professional-level contributors reflected clinician concerns of continuing life support measures perceived not in the patient's best interest. Team and unit-level factors were related to poor communication, bullying, and a lack of collegial collaboration. System-level factors included clinicians feeling unsupported by senior administration and institutional culpability as a result of healthcare processes and system constraints impeding reliable patient care delivery. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Texas Health IRB and the organization in which the study was conducted.

conclusionMoral distress was associated with feelings of anguish, professional intimidation, and organizational factors that impacted the delivery of ethically based patient care. Participants expressed a sense of awareness that they may experience ethical dilemmas as a consequence of the changing reality of providing healthcare within complex healthcare systems. Strategies to combat moral distress should target team and system interventions designed to improve interprofessional collaboration and support professional ethical values and moral commitments of all healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePsychometricsQualitative ResearchStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesFutile careintensive caremoral distressprofessional ethicsprofessional perspectives

Identifiers

PMID32406313
PMCPMC8077224
OpenAlexW3025256183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.