Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32406251›Full record

ArticleAssessment2021

Questioning the Meaning of a Change on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): Noncomparable Scores and Item-Specific Effects Over Time.

Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Saffire H Krance, Sandra E Black, Nathan Herrmann, Krista L Lanctôt, Bradley J MacIntosh, Michael Eid, Walter Swardfager

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shortening the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hugo Cogo-MoreiraFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-9237
Saffire H KranceSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6679-4067
Sandra E BlackSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nathan HerrmannSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Krista L LanctôtSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bradley J MacIntoshSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael EidFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Walter SwardfagerSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
CIHRNIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal invariance indicates that a construct is measured over time in the same way, and this fundamental scale property is a

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitionHumansLanguageNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseasecognitionlongitudinal invariancereliabilitystructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID32406251
PMCPMC8392777
OpenAlexW3025732574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.