Observational studyBrain and behavior2020
Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with "less treatment-resistant" depression by the Maudsley Staging Model.
Observational study in Brain and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), Benefits and Adverse Effects in Patients with Depression: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Rationale and design of a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial of 40 Hz light neurostimulation therapy for depression (FELIX).Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Looking through the lens of stigma: Understanding and anticipating concerns about the responsible development and use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs).SSM. Mental health · 2023Article
- Baseline levels of miR-223-3p correlate with the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depression.Translational psychiatry · 2023Article
- Factors associated with antidepressant responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in antidepressant-resistant depression.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with "less treatment-resistant" depression by the Maudsley Staging Model.Brain and behavior · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment-resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real-world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both treatment-resistant and nontreatment-resistant patients.
methodsAn observational study of symptom outcomes from admission to the time of discharge was conducted with 37 inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with ECT. Symptom severity was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HRSD-17) and treatment-resistance with the Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Stratifying at the MSM median admission characteristics and symptom change was compared between patients who were treatment-resistant (n = 18) and who were not (n = 19). The outcome difference between groups was compared using analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline characteristics including symptom severity, followed by linear regression to identify factors associated symptom improvement in the entire sample.
resultsThe sample (n = 37) showed moderate treatment-resistance (MSM = 7.30 ± 1.13) at admission and both groups received 8.3 ± 2 ECT sessions. The treatment-resistant group had a smaller proportion of bipolar patients and more severe symptoms, but showed no significant difference from the nontreatment-resistant group in HDRS-17 scores at the time of discharge (adjusted means = 6.23 ± 1.00 vs. 5.94 ± 0.97, Partial η
conclusionsSymptom change with ECT in depression did not differ by level of treatment-resistance but was greatest among those with more severe baseline symptoms. Correlates of ECT effectiveness should be further evaluated in stratified randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.