ArticlePhotosynthesis research2020
Nature of low-energy exciton levels in light-harvesting complex II of green plants as revealed by satellite hole structure.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Progress in Solution Structure Studies of Photosynthetic Proteins Using Small-Angle Scattering Methods.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Photosynthetic Light-Harvesting (Antenna) Complexes-Structures and Functions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Persistent non-photochemical hole burning at 4.2 K is an efficient experimental tool to unravel position and nature of low-energy excitonic states in pigment-protein complexes. This is demonstrated here for the case of the trimeric chlorophyll (Chl) a/b light-harvesting complexes of Photosystem II (LHC II) of green plants, where previous work (Pieper et al. J Phys Chem B 103:2412, 1999a) reported a highly localized lowest energy state at 680 nm. At that time, this finding appeared to be consistent with the contemporary knowledge about the LHC II structure, which mainly suggested the presence of weakly coupled Chl heterodimers. Currently, however, it is widely accepted that the lowest state is associated with an excitonically coupled trimer of Chl molecules at physiological temperatures. This raises the question, why an excitonically coupled state has not been identified by spectral hole burning. A re-inspection of the hole burning data reveals a remarkable dependence of satellite hole structure on burn fluence, which is indicative of the excitonic coupling of the low-energy states of trimeric LHC II. At low fluence, the satellite hole structure of the lowest/fluorescing ~ 680 nm state is weak with only one shallow satellite hole at 649 nm in the Chl b spectral range. These findings suggest that the lowest energy state at ~ 680 nm is essentially localized on a Chl a molecule, which may belong to a Chl a/b heterodimer. At high fluence, however, the lowest energy hole shifts blue to ~ 677 nm and is accompanied by two satellite holes at ~ 673 and 663 nm, respectively, indicating that this state is excitonically coupled to other Chl a molecules. In conclusion, LHC II seems to possess two different, but very closely spaced lowest energy states at cryogenic temperatures of 4.2 K.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.