ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020
Axial pulmonary trunk diameter variations during the cardiac cycle.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Inexpensive Cardiovascular Flow Simulator for Cardiac Catheterization Procedure Using a Pulmonary Artery Catheter.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies have shown a correlation between axial pulmonary trunk diameter (PTD) on chest computed tomography (CT) and pulmonary artery pressure. However, it is not known whether the PTD slices measured on chest CT have been recorded during the systolic or diastolic phase. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the variations in PTD during the cardiac cycle by measuring coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images.
methodsA retrospective analysis was made of 101 patients who underwent CCTA for coronary artery disease assessment. CCTA images were reconstructed during a full cardiac cycle and measurements were taken of the systolic and diastolic PTD and ascending aorta diameter (AAD) from the same slice by two independent observers.
resultsInter-observer agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99) for all CT measurements. The mean systolic PTD of all patients was 26.3 ± 3.6 mm and the mean diastolic PTD was 22.8 ± 3.2 mm (p < 0.001). The mean difference between systole and diastole was found to be 3.5 ± 1.2 mm for PTD, 1.2 ± 0.7 mm for AAD, and 0.1 ± 0.04 for the PTD/AAD ratio (p values < 0.001). There was no statistical significance of PTD variations according to gender, age, height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area.
conclusionWhen an increased PTD is detected in a chest CT compared to normal limits or a previous CT scan, this may be the result of the variation in PTD due to the cardiac cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32405785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.