Observational studyPediatric surgery international2020
Assessment of neurogenic bowel symptoms with the bowel dysfunction score in children with spina bifida: a prospective case-control study.
Observational study in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- TRANSLATION, CULTURAL ADAPTATION, AND SEMANTIC VALIDATION OF THE PEDIATRIC NEUROGENIC BOWEL DYSFUNCTION SCORE (NDBS) INTO BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE AND A PILOT STUDY.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2025Article
- Association Between Quality of Life and Neurogenic Bowel Symptoms by Bowel Management Program in Spina Bifida.Urology · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Management of Tethered Spinal Cord Syndrome in Children: Operationalizing an Outpatient Patient-Centered Workflow.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Transanal irrigation to manage neurogenic bowel in the pediatric population with spina bifida: a scoping review.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the quality of life (QoL) in children with spina bifida with a control group of their peers using a validated questionnaire, the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS).
methodsThe NBDS questionnaire was prospectively distributed to children attending a multi-disciplinary Spina Bifida clinic and healthy controls attending pediatric urology clinics. A score (out of 41) was assigned to each child based on their responses to the validated questionnaire. A lower score indicates better bowel function-related quality of life. SPSS software (v.25) was used for all statistical analysis.
resultsThere were 98 respondents to the questionnaire, 48 children with spina bifida and 50 controls. The average age of respondents was 7.88 years (3-16 years). Of those with Spina Bifida, 33 (69%) were on retrograde rectal irrigations, [19 (58%) Peristeen® system, 11 (33%) tube rectal irrigations, and 3 (9%) Willis system], 6 (12%) were on laxatives, and 9 (19%) were on no treatment. The median NBDS for Spina Bifida patients was significantly higher 13.5 (2-32) compared to the control group 2 (0-26, p < 0.001). Amongst Spina Bifida patients, there was no difference in quality of life between the modalities of bowel management (p = 0.203).
conclusionsDespite active bowel management, children with spina bifida report a worse quality of life compared to the control group. In those with spina bifida, the lack of a difference between various bowel management strategies, including no treatment, indicates the need for a longitudinal study to evaluate the basis for this unexpected finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32405766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.