Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405756›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Enzymatic removal of dags from livestock: an agricultural application of enzyme technology.

Laura Navone, Robert Speight

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura NavoneScience and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Robert SpeightScience and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. robert.speight@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-8272
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective removal of dags (manure balls) from cattle, sheep and goats is a significant issue for the livestock industry. Dags are hard recalcitrant deposits composed of materials, such as faeces, hair, soil, urine, feed and straw, and attach to the animal through the hair rather than the skin. Dags build up during wet periods, especially on long haired breeds, and can weigh up to 40 kg per animal for cattle. Dag removal prior to slaughter reduces the risk of microbial meat contamination and damage to the hide during leather processing. Existing removal methods include hair trimming or extensive hose washing that can result in stress to the animal and increased costs. An alternative solution is the application of enzyme formulations that target specific components of the dag so they are more easily removed by washing. Enzymes are already used in other cleaning applications and are proven for the breakdown of materials such as lignocellulose, protein or starch that are found in dags. This mini-review discusses the challenges of current dag removal methods and the state of the art and feasibility of applying enzyme formulations for the effective removal of dags. Although enzyme formulations are yet to be tested in large-scale cattle trials and questions remain regarding how they would be cost-effectively applied to live animals, the results at laboratory scale suggest further research is warranted. Overall, enzymes present an environmentally friendly solution to the high costs and animal welfare issues of current dag removal methods through significant reductions in cleaning time and water use. KEY POINTS: • Dag formation on livestock is a major issue for industry and for animal welfare. • Current methods are costly and challenging for operators and the animal. • Enzymes can degrade dag components to aid release with keratinases showing promise. • Dag removal needs to be field tested, and positive business cases must be generated.

Indexed as

AgricultureAbattoirsAnimalsBiomassEnzymesKeratinsLigninLivestockManureEnzymesKeratinsLigninlignocelluloseManureBiomassDagEnzymesKeratinasesLivestock

Identifiers

PMID32405756
OpenAlexW3025969276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.