Observational studyMaternal and child health journal2020
Interpregnancy Interval in a Rural Guatemalan Population: Results from a Quality Improvement Database.
Observational study in Maternal and child health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial Contraceptive Choices of Women Enrolled in a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Trial
- Maternal sociodemographic characteristics of short and long interpregnancy intervals in Japan: an analysis using national birth data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The association between the interdelivery interval and early postpartum urinary incontinence in women who had consecutive vaginal deliveries: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Twelve-Month outcomes of a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Home-Based Postpartum Contraceptive Delivery in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala.Obstetrics and gynecology research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis analysis describes the interpregnancy interval (time from livebirth to subsequent conception) in a convenience sample of women living in Southwest Guatemala and the association of antepartum characteristics and postpartum outcomes with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months).
methodsThis is an observational study of a convenience sample of women enrolled in the Madres Sanas community antenatal/postnatal nursing program supported by the Center for Human Development in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala, between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019. We observed the distribution of interpregnancy intervals among the population of women with a reported date of last live birth, and used bivariate comparisons to compare women with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months) to those with an optimal interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) by antepartum, obstetric and delivery, and postpartum outcomes.
results171 parous women enrolled in the Madres Sanas program between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019, and reported the date of their last live birth. One hundred-forty-one (82.5%) women delivered and 130 of those women (92.2%) were seen for their 40-day postpartum visit. The mean interval was 37.1 months with a 22.1-month standard deviation. The median interval was 33.7 months with an interquartile range of 19.6-49.5 months. Among these women, 113 (66.1%) the interpregnancy interval was at least 24 months. The only covariate of all sociodemographic, obstetric and antepartum, delivery, and postpartum characteristics that differed between women who achieved an interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) compared to those that did not (< 24 months), was age (median 22.9, interquartile range (IQR) [19.1,27.0] vs median 24.8, IQR [21.6,27.9], respectively, p = 0.006). A regression model found that with each increasing year of age, the interpregnancy interval increases by 1.08 months, p = 0.025.
conclusionAmong parous women, two-thirds of women space pregnancies at least 24 months. Older women were more likely to have a longer interval between live births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.