ReviewHNO2020
[Spectroscopic investigation of the middle ear mucosa].
Review in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Impacts of Different Middle Ear Mucosal Conditions on Type I Tympanoplasty Outcomes.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe middle ear mucosa (MEM) plays a central role in the middle ear due to its function of providing regular ventilation. To date, assessment of the state of the MEM is only possible subjectively by the surgeon. An objective characterization of the state of the MEM is desirable.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to enable objective characterization of the MEM and test infrared (IR) spectroscopy as a possible diagnostic tool for clinical use. MATERIALS AND
methodsDuring middle ear surgery, 48 MEM samples were collected and divided into four groups according to clinical appearance: group I: normal MEM; group II: sclerotic MEM; group III: inflammatory thickened MEM; group IV: granulated MEM. After collection, samples were analyzed by IR spectroscopy to identify characteristic IR spectra.
resultsIn the supervised analysis of the selected images, the biochemical differences representing the decisive factors for classification into groups I to IV were characterized. The differences in amide bands, carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins permit reliable separation of the clinical categories.
conclusionSpectroscopic investigations enable objective characterization of the MEM. Conclusions regarding biochemical differences make it possible to weigh up treatment options. Routine use of IR spectroscopy in the operating theater requires histopathological comparison and an extended dataset with reference values of the individual groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.