Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405679›Full record

ReviewHNO2020

[The maxillary sinus via a prelacrimal approach as a gateway to the retromaxillary space and orbital floor].

Thomas Kühnel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas KühnelKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland. thomas.kuehnel@ukr.de.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endonasal surgery has emerged as the standard procedure for the majority of nasal and paranasal sinus pathologies. However, some pathological changes beyond the maxillary sinus seem to be out of the instrumental range and are addressed by open approaches. The prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus published by Zhou and coworkers has stimulated a rapid development of various procedures in this field. In the current work, the possibilities of the prelacrimal approach are illustrated by means of three clinical cases. The prelacrimal approach enables isolated fractures of the orbital floor to be reconstructed without the risk of lower eyelid complications. Meningo- or encephaloceles in the far lateral aspects of the sphenoid sinus are comparatively well reached via endonasal, transantral, and transpterygoid approaches. Until recently, tumors beyond the maxillary sinus were the domain of open surgery, particularly when they extended laterally of the maxillary sinus. The technique of choice was either a Caldwell-Luc or a midfacial degloving approach. Many of these operations can now be performed via the endonasal prelacrimal approach, with lower morbidity and more rapid postoperative healing. The approach described herein is equal if not superior to the traditional approaches in terms of overview and accessibility.

Indexed as

Maxillary SinusOrbitEndoscopyHumansMiddle cranial fossaOtorhinolaryngologic surgical proceduresParanasal sinus diseasesPterygopalatine fossaSphenoid sinus

Identifiers

PMID32405679
OpenAlexW3025566253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.