Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405570›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Protocol and recruitment results from a 13-week randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of different doses of nitrate-rich beetroot juice on cognition, cerebral blood flow and peripheral vascular function in overweight and obese older people.

Abrar M Babateen, Sofia Rubele, Oliver Shannon, Edward Okello, Ellen Smith, Nicholas McMahon, Gerry O'Brien, Emma Wightman, David Kennedy, John C Mathers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Abrar M BabateenHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Sofia RubeleHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Oliver ShannonHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Edward OkelloHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Ellen SmithBrain Performance and Nutrition Research Centre, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Nicholas McMahonSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Gerry O'BrienHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Emma WightmanBrain Performance and Nutrition Research Centre, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
David KennedyBrain Performance and Nutrition Research Centre, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
John C MathersHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Mario SiervoHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNorthumbria University · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUmm al-Qura University · SAUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNitrate-rich food can increase NO production and may induce positive effects on brain function. This study examined the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) testing the effects of prolonged consumption of incremental doses of dietary nitrate (NO

methodsThis was a single blind, four-arm parallel RCT conducted in 60 overweight and obese older participants. Eligible participants were randomized to:1) high NO

resultsParticipant recruitment started in July 2018 and ended in April 2019. Of all the recruitment strategies that were used, advertisement of the study via Facebook generated the highest response rate. Sixty-two participants consented and were enrolled. Overall, characteristics of included participants matched our recruitment criteria.

conclusionThe findings from this study provide evidence of the acceptability and feasibility of an intervention investigating the effects of incremental doses of high-nitrate BJ over a prolonged period.

trial registrationThe intervention study was registered with clinical trial ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN14746723) on 27 December 2018.

Indexed as

Beetroot juiceBlood pressureCerebral blood flowCognitionInorganic nitrateOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID32405570
PMCPMC7212182
OpenAlexW3018107043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.