Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405470›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2020

Day case

Aditya Borakati, Asad Ali, Chetana Nagaraj, Srinivas Gadikoppula, Michael Kurer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The cost evaluation of day-case compared to inpatient cochlear implantation in adults: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditya BorakatiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital and University College London, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom. a.borakati@doctors.org.uk.
Asad AliDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom.
Chetana NagarajDepartment of Anaesthesia, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom.
Srinivas GadikoppulaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom.
Michael KurerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMiddlesex University · GBNorth Middlesex Hospital · GBUniversity Foundation · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDay case total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a novel approach, not widely practiced in Europe. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients comparing elective day case and inpatient TSAs in our United Kingdom centre.

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of day case TSA compared to standard inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.

methodsAll patients undergoing TSA between January 2017 and July 2018 were included. Outcome measures were: Change in abduction and extension 3 mo postoperatively; 30-d postoperative adverse events and re-admissions in day case and inpatient groups. We also conducted an economic evaluation of outpatient arthroplasty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for demographic and operative covariates.

resultsFifty nine patients were included, 18 d cases and 41 inpatients. There were no adverse events or re-admissions at 30 d postoperatively in either group. There were no significant differences in adjusted flexion (mean difference 16.4, 95%CI: 17.6-50.5,

conclusionDay case TSA is a safe, effective procedure, with significant cost benefit. Wider use may be warranted in the United Kingdom and beyond, with potential for significant cost savings and improved efficiency.

Indexed as

Ambulatory careArthroplastyCohort studiesDay caseOrthopedicsShoulder

Identifiers

PMID32405470
PMCPMC7206195
OpenAlexW3015842781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.