Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32405425›Full record

ArticleJournal of virus eradication2020

'Informed and empowered': a mixed-methods study of crowdsourcing contests to promote uptake of HIV self-testing kits among African Americans.

Allison Mathews, Donaldson Conserve, Hailey Mason, Le'Marus Alston, Stuart Rennie, Joseph Tucker

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison MathewsDepartment of Social Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Donaldson ConserveDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Hailey MasonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Le'Marus AlstonDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Stuart RennieDepartment of Social Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Joseph TuckerInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Disease, UNC Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHIV self-testing (HIVST) kits are a viable alternative to testing in clinical settings, but research on the effective ways of promoting uptake of HIVST kits has been lacking. The present study examines crowdsourcing contests as community engagement to promote uptake of HIVST kits among African Americans in the southern region of the US.

methodsThis mixed-methods study design evaluated two contests through qualitative assessment of contest entries. The first contest elicited ideas on how to promote HIVST kits. The second contest sought branding ideas for a pop-up HIVST booth. Qualitative data were digitally transcribed and analysed using MAXQDA software and axial coding.

resultsThe study participants (

conclusionCrowdsourcing contests are a beneficial community engagement tool to identify new ways to promote uptake of HIVST kits.

Indexed as

African Americanscommunity engagementcrowdsourcingHIVHIV testing

Identifiers

PMID32405425
PMCPMC7213069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.